Font Size: a A A

Study Of Denitrification And Demercuration By MnO2@TiO2 Catalysts

Posted on:2020-10-21Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:C F LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2381330596983071Subject:Chemical engineering
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
China is the currently the country with the largest amount of coal production and demand in the world.The coal-fired flue gas is one of the primary sources of air pollutants,especially NOx and Hg0 have received extensive attention as two atmospheric contaminants emitted from coal-fired boilers.NOx emissions can cause photochemical smog,acid rain and other environmental problems,Hg0 is a global pollutant with toxicity,bio-accumulation and volatility,both of them can result in lots of environmental and health risks.It has been proven that a lot of commercial catalysts used in selective catalytic reduction?SCR?are favorable for the oxidation of Hg0 along with NO removal process.Accordingly,based on the situation of our country and existing pollution control devices in coal-fired power plants,it is the most economical way to use currently available pollution control devices such as SCR to remove Hg0 from the flue gas.However,the conventional supported SCR catalysts are prone to SO2poisoning at low temperature.In this dissertation,a series of MnO2@TiO2 catalysts are prepared by constructing a core-shell structure.MnO2 with high low temperature activity is used as the core,and TiO2 is the shell with high sulfur resistance.A series of MnO2@TiO2catalysts are prepared by adjusting the amount of precursor.The denitration test of MnO2@TiO2 catalyst and the resistance performance test of SO2 and H2O are carried out in a fixed bed.The best catalyst MnO2@TiO2 is used for the study of mercury removal and synergistic denitrification and mercury removal.The effect of SO2 on the performance is mainly investigated.Firstly,the core-shell structure MnO2@TiO2 catalyst is prepared by two-step method,and TEM found that it has obvious core-shell boundary.The removal efficiency of NO and the resistance to SO2 and H2O poisoning over MnO2 and MnO2@TiO2?x:y?catalysts are compared.The results show that the TiO2 shell enhance the high temperature activity and sulfur and water resistance of the catalyst,and with the increase of the amount of TiO2,the higher the NO removal efficiency and sulfur and water resistance in the middle and high temperature range.However,excessive TiO2 will result in poor activity at low temperature.The NO conversion efficiency of MnO2@TiO2 remained above 78%within the temperature range of 225-350?.In view of the MnO2@TiO2?1:2?catalyst with the best relative denitrification activity in the upper part,mercury removal performance and SO2 toxicity resistance is further explored.The results show that MnO2@TiO2?1:2?has high mercury removal performance and SO2toxicity resistance.The removal efficiency of Hg0 is about 45%for 130 min pure N2 flue gas component and it is about 25%for 75 min N2+100 ppm SO2 flue gas component.TGA result shows that MnSO4 accumulated on the surface of MnO2@TiO2?1:2?is low,so its SO2 toxicity resistance is high.Finally,the synergistic denitrification and mercury removal performance and the effects of various flue gas components NSR,O2,H2O and SO2 on the synergistic denitrification and mercury removal on MnO2@TiO2?1:2?catalyst are investigated.The results show that the NO conversion efficiency and Hg0 oxidation efficiency of MnO2@TiO2?1:2?in SCR+Hg0atmosphere are lower than those of simulated flue gas alone.NH3 inhibits the mercury removal efficiency of the catalyst and promotes the denitration efficiency;O2 can enhance the catalytic activity of MnO2@TiO2?1:2?for simultaneous Hg0 oxidation and NO conversion;While,H2O and SO2 show prohibitive effects on the simultaneous Hg0 oxidation and NO conversion.
Keywords/Search Tags:NO_x, Hg~0, core-shell structure, MnO2, Simultaneous Hg~0 oxidation and NO conversion
PDF Full Text Request
Related items