Aesthetics Quality Assessment On The Plant Landscape Of Guangzhou Airport Expressway

In recent years,with the rapid advancement of China’s economic development and urbanization process,people’s requirements for expressway planting have also improved.This paper studies the plant landscape of Guangzhou airport expressway.through the visual and space Angle.quantitative analysis urban expressway plant landscape.Discussing how to adapt the configuration of artificial plant community to the expressway environment.To discuss the ornamental effect of plants in the expressway greening of Guangzhou airport expressway and how to play the construction function in this space form.The purpose of this study is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of artificial landscape in Guangzhou airport expressway.Provide basis theory,data support and suitable evaluation system to other areas in the construction of scientific and reasonable expressway plant landscape.Based on this,it is of great academic and practical significance to evaluate and study the landscape of Guangzhou airport expressway after construction.This research based on four research methods: literature reading,field investigation,Balanced Incomplete Block design-Law of Comparative Judgment and case analysis.Investigate the present situation of plant landscape in Guangzhou airport expressway.Recording the plant type,plant growth,planting method,planting arrangement characteristic.Through Garden plant species and composition,plant application,plant ornamental characteristics,the principle of plant landscaping,the main points of Garden art,to analyze the planting and design status and existing problems in Guangzhou airport expressway.This paper use Balanced Incomplete Block design-Law of Comparative Judgment to Evaluate and analyze 25 representative landscape samples of Guangzhou airport expressway,discuss the characteristics of the landscape and the difference of evaluation results.The Plant landscape beauty value levels in this research are relatively balanced.The beauty values of each samples are concentrated around score 2.1.The average beauty value of samples ranked from high to low is sample 1,sample 16,sample 2,sample 6,sample 5,sample 8,sample 9,sample 4,sample 11,sample 20,sample 12,sample 14,sample 10,sample 3,sample 7,sample 19,sample 21,sample 22,sample 17,sample 18,sample 15,sample 25,sample 13,sample 24,sample 23.Among them,sample 1,sample 16,sample 2,sample 6 are considered to be the best samples because their average beauty value is higher than score 2.2.In opposite,the average beauty values of sample 13,sample 24,sample 23 are less than score 2.0,and these samples are considered as the worst samples.The evaluation results show that the aesthetic of expert group is based on the in-depth understanding of this subject knowledge,so the expert group’s evaluations are more detailed,specific and less affected by the other elements.They can even give Predictive evaluations.In contrast,the non-professional student group and the public group performed more relaxing and interestingly in the evaluation process.Although they actively cooperate with the investigation and arrange the landscape order according to their preferences,their evaluation results are different from the expert group.They only evaluated the landscape with the first visual perception,without definite criteria for the quality of the landscape and easy to be influenced by light and color of the samples in the evaluation process.