The Intersecting Of Multiple Powers—as A Symptom Of The "Ordinary World"

Behind each historical narrative,a historical philosophy is hidden,and the same is true of literature.In the first thirty years and thirty years after that,there are two important and opposite ways of classification:the modern and contemporary literary stage theory and the twentieth Century Chinese literature.The two ways of literary history are characterized by its politicization or de politicization,and become the object of people's repeated discussion because of the transformation of political power and discourse power in different times.The two is common,with a linear objective theory about the way in which the discussion is more advanced,or one is firmly subjected to the political reality,the other is trying to get rid of the political control,seeking to achieve self transcendence of literature.The theory of these two kinds of attitude theory seems to have some top-down,political pressure or,but the result is literature had never been away from political power.But acknowledges that the infiltration of some cultural political power does not mean that the way of classification of the linear objective theory is correct,but under this premise,I try to put forward a new literary tradition—"people's Literature" tradition.This distinct position of the people,as a undercurrent,has been obscured in the narration of different literary history.Lu Xun,Zhao Shuli,Liu Qing and Lu Yao have stood firmly in this position at a moment of special historical moment.But this position is sometimes not firm,as A1 Du Jose's theory of "encounter materialism",different elements encounter in their work,and have ups and downs in different historical changes in the situation,how to reveal even create their significance through the power of words in the multiple conclusion is worth pay attention to.In such a literary history outlook and research methods,I tried to reenter Lu Yao's"ordinary world".The existing criticism to Lu Yao,are focused on the characterization of the personal image of Lu Yao and the rendering of the loess land complex,or criticize it with afterlight apathy(this afterlight,to a certain extent,make the path of the reform process inevitable,and participation in the reinforcement of the reform words),while ignoring the writing of this special moment in history,and a certain degree of vitality and anger in the early stage of the reform,which inspire people's imagination and possibility.The criticism of Sun Shaoping's personal image is somewhat pessimistic or unrealistic,and coincides with the established reality of "Sun Shao Ping men" who left behind in the marathon process after 90s.But when we return to the particular space and the fiction of this novel,it can be found that went through the period of socialist construction after the the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and the rural community,the fate of Sun Shaoping is in an environment that is not nourishing.This is the process of growing up from a(wandering)young country literature to the working class.In coal mine work,he found a collective identity.And this identity,indeed,comes down in one continuous line with Liu Qing.