| The deepening of cultural exchanges between China and France in recent years,has led to Kristeva's visit to China,and promoted the publishing of Chinese versions of her related works and other academic activities.Academia in China has begun re-studying the works of Kristeva.Apart from the concept of intertextuality,her theory of semi-analysis and criticism toward feminism have been carefully read and fully explained domestically.The trend of studying the works of Kristeva is growing among domestic academia.When it comes to the renowned French semiotician,literary critic Julia Kristeva,Francois Dosse and others will always relate her to the word of“history”.They believe Kristeva solved "historical"problems that cannot be dealt with by structuralism.The key word of "history"has already drawn the attentions of scholars who study structuralism and theories of Kristeva,and academia in China also has its own interpretation.However,when we delve deeper into the questions like,What is"History"How Structuralism Abandoned "History"?and How Kristeva Recalled "History"?,seldom articles have comprehensive study and results.Semi-analysis,as Kristeva's academic achievement in mid 1970s,fully demonstrated her inheritance and transcendence of structuralism.This paper takes "history"as an entry point to delve into Kristeva's semi-analysis,comparing semi-analysis with theory of structuralism,and studying simultaneously the structuralism's abandoning of"history"and the methods,ways and purposes of Kristeva's recalling of"history".Through such study we can see that,semi-analysis with the recalled"history"is not only Kristeva's scalpel to dissect symbolic and text,but also her"ways"to interpret the world and society.She armed with semi-analysis,deeply criticizing the society,participating in practices of social awareness like criticism toward feminism,showing readers the possibilities of multi-interpreting texts and the society,and fulfilling herself as an intellectual. |
PDF Full Text Request