On The Relationship Between Wittgenstein's "Phenomenological Language" And "Private Language"

Wittgenstein strongly dismisses "private language" in Philosophical Investigations,but I find that Wittgenstein's writing themes on "private language" overlaps with his mid-term writing themes.On this basis,this paper attempts to discuss that "phenomenological language" and "private language" are two sides of the same language,and the two sides of the language will coexist in the language game under the deep grammatical overview.The specific discussion is as follows: 1.This paper firstly distinguishes the different positions of "phenomenology" and "phenomenological language" in the Wittgenstein's philosophy.The former's apriority intensity is greater than or equal to the latter's,but the former is absolutely unspeakable.By discussing the changes that Wittgenstein has made in the linguistic paradigm,this thesis attempts to clarify the inevitable reason for the paradigm shift,which leads to the emergence of deep phenomenological language.3.By discussing the relationship between pure phenomena and linguistic phenomena,this section shows the relationship between pure phenomenological language and deep phenomenological language.Pure phenomenological language can only describe shallow phenomena,while deep phenomenology language can describe the deep phenomenon which contains the shallow phenomena.4.By discussing the failure of Wittgenstein's using pure phenomenological language to deal with the problem of "colors incompatibility",this paper illustrates the possible so-called solipsistic tendency of pure phenomenological language,namely the private tendency,which confirms,on the one hand,that pure phenomenological language is a phenomenological language with a private tendency;in order to eliminate this "private" tendency,the pure phenomenological language is transformed into a shallow phenomenological language in a deep phenomenological language.We also explain why grammar may be phenomenological.5.Even in the "object-name" model of Wittgenstein's naming of feelings,that is,the argument of refuting private language,Wittgenstein does not deny that our language can express feelings,to express the feelings is the function of phenomenological language.Therefore,this language that may be refuted as a private language must also have its phenomenological side.This also proves that private language is a private language with a phenomenological tendency;6.at the same time,we treat the phenomenology as the physiognomy,by demonstrating that there is no physiognomy to dispel the privateness of "private language",this paper attempts to lay a foundation for the coexistence between the private language with a phenomenological tendency and physical language in language-games.Finally,this article will try to use the deep grammatical of "rain" to illustrate the blending between "pure phenomenological language-private language" and physical language in language-games.