The Influence Of Social Distance On Pupil's Moral Judgment Under Social Exclusion

Social exclusion is a social phenomenon related to bullying behavior.The long-term experience of rejection will bring many negative effects on the physical and mental health of both the rejected and the rejected individuals.Primary school is an important stage of individual social development,improve pupils' moral awareness of social exclusion behavior,help pupils cultivate good interpersonal relationships,and form a sound personality.Previous studies on social exclusion mainly focused on the harm of social exclusion to individual psychology,and paid less attention to how individuals perceive social exclusion behavior.Therefore,through the investigation of elementary school students' moral judgment,this study aims to understand their evaluation of social exclusion,and tries to explore the influence of social distance and social exclusion experience on their moral judgment.This study consists of three parts.In the first part,a total of 548 primary school students in grade 5 and grade 6 were tested by the social exclusion questionnaire of primary school students,to investigate the status quo of social exclusion of primary school students.The second part takes a total of 418 primary school students in grade5 and grade 6 as the research object,compiles the questionnaire of moral judgment in the situation of primary school students' rejection,and analyzes the characteristics of primary school students' moral judgment about social rejection.The third part adopts the experimental method,taking 45 primary school students in grade 5 and grade 6 as the research object,to study the influence of social distance on the moral judgment of primary school students under the social exclusion.There are two studies in total.The first one mainly investigates whether the moral judgment of primary school students is consistent in the case of social distance difference.The second study further investigated whether pupils' moral judgments were affected by their own experiences of rejection in the case of social distance differences.This study draws the following conclusions:(1)overall,senior primary school students are less socially excluded.There was no significant difference in the total score of social exclusion between the sexes,grades and ages.(2)social distance influences pupils' moral judgment.There was a significant difference between "best friend-stranger" and "best friend-self".Specifically,"stranger" had higher false evaluation score than "good friend",and "best friend" had higher false evaluation score than "self";There was a significant difference between self-stranger and "self-best friend".Specifically,"self" scored higher in terms of harmfulness than "stranger" and "best friend".(3)social exclusion affects pupils' moral judgment.Specifically,high score was significantly higher than low score in both error evaluation and injury evaluation.(4)there is an interaction between social distance and social exclusion in the false evaluation of primary school students.Specifically,under the social distance of "strangers" and "best friends",the error evaluation score of high score group was significantly higher than that of low score group.There was a significant difference between "self-best friend" and "self-best friend".The error evaluation of high score was not affected by social distance.(5)there is no interaction between social distance and social exclusion in the harmfulness evaluation of primary school students.