A Study On The Legal Problems Of The "Double Counterfeit" Investigation In China

The content of antidumping and countervailing measures in the WTO rules is stipulated in the WTO "Agreement on Antidumping Measures" and "Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures "(referred to as "SCM Agreement")."Double antidumping" is the abbreviation of antidumping and countervailing measures,and anti-dumping and countervailing measures are two different kinds of trade relief measures in international trade relief measures.Antidumping and countervailing measures also have different application scenarios and relief methods.In order to strive for the maximum effect of trade relief,the sponsors of trade disputes often use both at the same time to protect the development of related industries in their own countries.Taking the case of the United States against Chinese plywood products as an example,this paper analyzes whether the United States against Chinese plywood products against the case is in conformity with the relevant regulations and whether the tax amount is reasonable.The focus of this case is on whether there is a continued application of the alternative State approach and whether there are two focuses of double relief.Taking empirical analysis and theoretical analysis as the main research methods,this paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions on how to deal with the "double reverse" investigation.In the first part,the author introduces the current situation and the reasons of the "double reverse" investigation in the United States.In this context,we can better understand why our plywood products are frequently subjected to "double reverse" investigation in such a short period of time.In the second part,we take the case of "double antidumping" of the United States against Chinese plywood products as an example to study the unlawfulness of "double antidumping" measures taken by the United States against Chinese plywood products,as well as to expound on the alternative country practices and double relief issues involved in the case.In the third part,according to the controversial focus of the case,this paper will focus on the analysis of the illegality of China's continued use of alternative countries and the existence of double relief in the United States.Analyze the unreasonableness of continuing to use alternative countries for China and the dilemma of facing the U.S."double reverse"investigation.In the fourth part,the author studies the corresponding suggestions for the problems in the third chapter.How should the government,industry and enterprises deal with the "double counter-measure" of the United States.