Research On Verdict Methods Of Administritive Agreements

In recent years,China's administration methods have been continuously improved,and "flexible administration" represented by administrative agreements(administrative agreements,administrative compacts,and administrative contracts have the same understanding)has begun to play an important role in the administration.With the increased number of administrative agreement cases,the existing problems on the verdict methods of administrative agreements have become increasingly prominent.The main manifestations are as follows: First,there are insufficient types of judgment methods to meet the needs of judicial practice;second,the application conditions of judgment methods are not clear enough,and it is difficult to make appropriate choices;third,the system of judgment methods has not been established yet,and the relationship is not clear enough among various types of verdict methods.The article can be divided into four parts: firstly,the general overview of the relevant theories on verdict methods of administrativeagreements.Secondly,the gradual progress,issues and causes of China's current administrative agreements on verdict methods.Thirdly,the comparison and reference of the extraterritorial regulations of administrative agreements on verdict methods,administrative agreements in civil law systems,countries with common law systems,and Taiwan in China are introduced,and the parts worthy of learning from are summarized.Fourthly,specific proposals of administrative agreements on verdict methods to be perfect,application conditions of which are definite,new verdict methods increased,and types of the ones are divided.