Legal Research On Defending Lawyer’s Violation Of Rules

In criminal proceedings,the defense lawyers defend the interests of the parties by persuading the judges to accept their own defense opinions,and the judges should be a mutual respect by the equality of the prosecution and the defense against the middle referees.However,in recent years there has been a fierce conflict between judges and lawyers,and a series of defense lawyers have violated the rules.This article will use legal sociology,empirical analysis,etc.to analyze the problem of defense lawyers resigning in violation of the rules.In addition to the introduction,the text is divided into three parts,totaling more than 20,000 words.The first part is an empirical analysis of the case of defense lawyers who violated the rules.The main reason is to analyze the status quo of cases of illegal resignation by listing the cases of defense lawyers who violated the rules.The status quo of the defense lawyer’s violation of the lawsuit is reflected in the fact that the lawyers who violated the rules are experienced,the way to retreat is the collective retreat,and the violation of the rules is due to the procedural rights being damaged,the violation of the rules is mostly temporary,and the procedure after the court is closed.The court may continue to hear and defend lawyers in violation of the rules to swear to the public.The second part is the analysis of the reasons for the defense lawyers’ violation of the law,from the aspects of lawyers,judges and litigation structure.The reason for the lawyers is mainly to express dissatisfaction with the refusal of procedural application,to protect the interests of the defendant,to analyze the four aspects of the self-reporting and to raise concerns about a legal issue;the main reason for the judge is from the lawsuit.Cultural remnants,improper exercise of judges’ court command,and judges are not neutral,causing dissatisfaction of defense lawyers,non-independence of judges,reduction of court authority,judges’ taboos on media supervision and restrictions on trial disclosure;system construction mainly from lawyers’ rights The lack of a guarantee system and the lack of a criminal lawsuit against lawyers are analyzed.The third part mainly proposes measures to resolve the violation of the defense lawyer’s violations,mainly including promoting the benign interaction between the judge and the lawyer in the trial;establishing the relationship of mutual trust and prosecution;improving the judicial system;improving the lawyer’s rights guarantee system;standardizing the trial disclosure and the lawyer’s public speech Act and add contempt of court.Promote the benign interaction between judges and lawyers in the trial mainly by focusing on "procedural justice",transforming the judicial concept of judges,improving the judges’ ability to control trials and enhancing the defense lawyers’ compliance with the court order consciousness;establishing interactive mutual trust and prosecution relations mainly through establishing inspections The system of legal interaction and the promotion of mutual trust in the prosecution;the improvement of the judicial system is mainly accomplished by promoting the neutrality of judges,the independence of trials,and the construction of a legal professional community;the improvement of the lawyer’s rights guarantee system is mainly accomplished by improving the lawyer’s rights relief system and strengthening the communication and disciplinary functions of the lawyers’ association;The practice of standardizing trial disclosure and lawyers’ public speech mainly consists of strictly implementing the open system of trials and regulating the public statements of lawyers;the crime of contempt of court is constructed by adding laws.