Research On The System Of Responsibility Investigation Of Criminal Misjudged Cases In The Process Of Rule Of Law

In order to pursue judicial justice,the quality of case handling by public security organs and judicial personnel of the courts has been continuously improved,and the status of the judiciary in.the hearts of the people has been raised.The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China proposed to improve the judicial system reform centered on trials,and implement the judicial responsibility system in practice,thereby safeguardin g the legitimate rights and interests of each p arty and reducing the occurrence of unjust and false cases.Based on the systematic research on the accountability system of the public security organs and the courts in China,through continuous reflection,the paper draws the current situation that the irmplem entation of the public security organs and the courts' accountability system is not ideal,and the problems from them.The starting point is to improve the public security organs and the court's accountabil ity system for wrong cases.It is expected that in the future reform of the judicial system,China can form a system of correct accountability for public security organs and courts.This paper is devoted to the research on the accountability system of criminal misjudged cases.It is mainly based on the acquittal of guilty crimes.It is the starting point of empirical research from Yunnan public security organs and courts,supplemented by the background of big data in the country.Study the system of accountability for errors and errors in public security organs and people's courts.The full text only needs to be discussed from six parts:The first part is the introduction,the main content is the research background,research significance,and the research content and research metbhods.The second part is an overview,combining the current trial-centered judicial system reform and the pursuit of value for fairness and justice and procedural rule of law,clearly defining and classifying concepts such as wrongful cases,defamation cases,and accountability for misjudged cases,and clarifying the accountability of criminal misj udged cases.Standard.The third part is the empirical research,which is based on the criminal misjudged cases issued before the 18th National Congress and after the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China,and analyzes the current situation of the judicial practice of correcting the wrong case after correcting the wrong case.The fourth part raises the question,analyzes the status quo and mechanism of the criminal investigation system of criminal cases between the two organs from the perspective of public security organs and courts,and analyzes the possible deficiencies and their causes.The fifth part is the measures and suggestions,and proposes a perfect path to perfect the accountability system for wrong cases in China.The sixth part is the conclusion,indicating the lack of research and improvement.