Study On The Issue Of "High Apple Tax" Related To Monopoly

Apple in smartphones and computers in recent years the innovation change definitely won the global consumer's affection,but as for the dividends of the innovation and to fade away,an apple to protect themselves in the position in the market and high profit margins,they constantly take some business methods such as single from the software high for consumers to download a free subscription to project the default deduction and from the perspective of developers charge 30%into,and so on from the perspective of profit,apple's profit margins which has been in a relatively stable state but such bullying behavior really no problem?Under apple's payment mechanism,users can't live without it,but take it as their inability.What this paper wants to discuss is whether apple's tax behavior has violated the content stipulated by the anti-monopoly law,and whether it has materially damaged consumptionResearch methods of this article mainly USES the case analysis method,to apple's monopolies,three cases and events as a representative of the company as the research object,and around the company over the years mobile tenminal and computer users to use IAP(in-app purchase)charge high apple tax behavior analysis,summarizes the case and highlight the focus of dispute in the case and the problems involved in focus by chapterIn Chapter one is the introduction of this chapter is apple's first charge high in recent years apple tax to illustrate the research background and research significance,proposed apple tax affects people's lives,imperceptible has let people form is supposed to pay high price for apple mentality of this kind of curing the current consumption is reasonable obviously become the focus of most controversy In addition,this chapter,the framework and the content of the paper,this text adopts the research methods to make a summary,at the same time also introduced in this paper,with the innovative learning from antitrust economics and antitrust law Angle of two subject combined with each other,from apple on monopoly needs to define the relevant market that the implementation of the abuse of dominant market position behavior also took chapter progressive approachChapter two discusses the company involved in the antitrust cases and events is introduced and the controversial focus of this chapter is led with apple electronic book,illustrate WeChat exceptional apple smoke into event Spoifty v.v.monopoly and restrict competition case American consumers apple three high-profile cases in summing up the viewpoint of the more common academic and theoretical opinions on the focus of the relevant cases involving questions including how to define the relevant market apple whether apple has a dominant market positiort,and how abuse of dominant market position for concrete elaboration and analysis of three major disputeChapter three is discussed in this chapter as the first focus questions how to define the relevant market part of apple's apple users scholars and even think that does not have a dominant market position,this point of view based on the premise that they will be apple's relevant market definition is too large or seemingly do not have a dominant market position in fuzzy lead to apple so this chapter will focus on new and used relevant market namely traditional market and the Internet of the comparison of the relevant market definition,offered to the regional market products market the bilateral market definition method of combining both the accepted a bilateral market definition At the same time,this paper defines the relevant market of apple as the application software download market,and thus leads to the next chapter whether apple occupies a dominant position in the application software download markets.Chapter four discusses the company's relevant market dominance in this chapter puts forward the company monopoly of identifying mainly from three different perspective,combined with China's anti-monopoly law and other relevant laws and regulations to analyze both learn from each other,put forward the cognizance of the dominant market position under the network environment should not only take the previous traditional industry recognition method,including using that different perspectives such as mentioned in this chapter of the market is divided into perspective,and product has strong dependence or relative advantage position Angle of view and whether the product market has exclusive or other related products will be able to enter the market situation of the three perspectivesChapter Five abuse of dominant market position to implement charge high return apple apple tax behavior,respectively,in combination with the second Chapter:three major cases due to the high apple tax collection and the abuse of dominant position unreasonable behavior such as additional unreasonable conditions of IPA channels must be used to purchase goods for software developers to reject the deal and even refused to pay taxes frame using the big apple tax raised such as virtual commodity prices forced consumers or sellers undertake under the content of each secondary title also summarized relative encroach upon objects and alouse of dominant market position behavior...