The Research On Fair Competition Review System

Since the establishment of the top-level design of the fair competition review system,the domestic academic circles have conducted extensive and in-depth studies,and the research focuses mainly on the discussion of top-level design theory,but for the top-level design and practice the research problem is less and not a system at the grass-roots level.So,this article hopes to discusses the top-level design problems in the process of linking to the practice at the grass-roots level and possible problems from the perspective of the system in practice,and according to the system theory and the status quo of the system to give the perfect proposal.The first part through a review leads to the reality of the system of fair competition censorship.Enterprise about car detailed rules for the implementation of the Beijing committee of Beijing review reply was first issued by the government level is also the only once so far public review reply,its content is sparked intense discussion,field against a lot of noise and criticism,poses the author further think censorship of fair competition.The second part is the analysis of the value target and positioning of the fair competition examination system based on the theoretical research.First of all,from the competition order of effective regulation,the maintenance of social and public interests to the coordinated development of market economy,the value target,in this paper the value target of analysis provides solutions to solving problems for the rest of the article.Then the censorship of fair competition positioning analysis,mainly including between antitrust and loose control positioning,between industry policy and competition policy orientation and positioning between rationality legality examination and review.This also provides the theoretical method and basis for the following practical dilemma and path selection.The third part is to analyze the connection between the top-level design of the fair competition review system and the grass-roots practice.It is divided into four parts: the cohesion dilemma of the review body includes the formalization of self-examination and the non-specialization of the examination organ.The bridging dilemma of the object of review includes the conflict between the subject and the upper law,the cohesion between the stock and the incremental review.The cohesion dilemma of the review standard includes the defects of unified standard and the deficiency of qualitative analysis.The examination of the cohesion of the exemption includes the abuse of the applicable situation and the obstacles to the applicable conditions.The fourth part is the combination theory to give the path choice for the above dilemma.With the plight of the one-to-one correspondence,the four sorts of path selection: crack review body join problem,need to build multivariate joint review system in our country,at the same time to formulate the competitive assessment reference books.To solve the problem of cohesion,we need to refine the process of classification review,and to coordinate the stock review and incremental review.In order to solve the problem of cohesion,it is necessary to set up the standard of the examination and the quantitative analysis method of the system.In order to solve the problem of cohesion,it is necessary to follow the analysis method of Lu Man system and propose the establishment of absolute exemption and relative exemption system.