Study On Changes In Welfare Of Farmers' Homesteads In Different Types Of Livelihood Assets

Rural homesteads have made significant contributions to the development of China 's socialist economic and social undertakings,and have played a fundamental role in consolidating collective economic organizations and ensuring that collective members have a “household to live in”.With the acceleration of China's industrialization and urbanization and the continuous change of social structure and division of labor,the production and lifestyle of rural residents have also changed significantly.A large number of farmers have moved to cities to work and buy homes.Problems such as multi-family housing and super-standard land occupation have emerged.Establishing a perfect rural homestead system and constructing an effective rural homestead exit mechanism is an important way to revitalize idle,inefficient use of homesteads,change the extensive use of rural land resources and optimize the allocation,and become an important reform of the rural homestead system.content.Therefore,it is of great practical significance to carry out research on the changes in farmers' welfare after the withdrawal of house sites,to promote the efficient and orderly utilization of current rural house sites,to promote urban-rural integrated development,and to realize rural revitalization strategies.Based on the theoretical framework of sustainable livelihoods,this paper investigates the 301 households who have withdrawn from their homesteads in Fuhong Town,Qingbaijiang District,Chengdu to obtain basic data,constructs an appraisal system for homesteady assets withdrawn from homesteads,and uses the quantitative method of livelihood assets to evaluate the livelihoods of farmers withdrawn from homesteads Based on Amartya Sen's feasibility theory,a farmer welfare evaluation index system was constructed,and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method wasused to calculate the welfare status of farmers 'homestead exit from different types of livelihood assets.Through investigation and analysis,the research results of this article are as follows:(1)The welfare of the farmers households who have withdrawn from the sample area has generally improved after the withdrawal of their homestead.The fuzzy index of farmer welfare of the total sample in the study area increased from 0.500 before the exit to 0.552,indicating that the overall welfare level of the farmer households has improved after the homestead exit.Among the 6 functions selected for farmer welfare,the four functions of living conditions,social security,community status,and psychological feelings have significantly improved the welfare level before the withdrawal of the homestead,and the two welfare functions of economic status and development opportunities have different degrees.Decline.(2)There are differences in the changes in the welfare level of farmers with different types of livelihood assets.The three types of livelihood asset types have different levels of improvement in the overall welfare level of farmers.The specific manifestations are asset-rich farmers(0.604)> general assets(0.577)> asset-lack(0.573).The effect of improving the welfare level is the best.(3)Withdrawal of homesteads has further strengthened the differentiation of welfare levels among farmers with different types of livelihood assets.After analyzing the fuzzy index distribution of welfare of the sample farmers,it is found that the distribution of the welfare level of the three types of farmers shows a “normal distribution” trend.The higher the total value of household livelihood assets,the higher the interval value of the peak value distribution of the fuzzy index of welfare.As the total value of livelihood assets is higher,the welfare level increases more obviously,and the lower the total value of livelihood assets of farmers,the lower the increase in the welfare level of farmers.Based on the above research conclusions,the following policy suggestions are proposed:(1)increase the household income of farmers who withdraw from homesteads;(2)formulate differentiated compensation programs for farmers with different types of livelihood assets;(3)establish and improve employment support policies for farmers withdraw from homestead.