Comparative Study On The System Of Social Credit Government Supervision

The British philosopher Bacon said: “The consequences of an unfair judicial decision are equivalent to 10 crimes,because crimes only dirty a stream of water,and the wrong judicial decision is to pollute the entire water source.” However,a number of false and false cases that have been exposed in recent years have seriously damaged judicial fairness and the credibility of the court.The final responsibility system for the quality of judges is pushed into public view in this context.In June 2015,the Internet announced that Wang Guirong,a Henan judge,had been found guilty of negligence and sentenced to imprisonment for one year and nine months for misjudging the case(Yu Zhehai case).Wang Guirong appealed against the verdict of the first instance.In November 2017,the verdict of the second instance was only reduced from one year and nine months to one and a half months.It still believes that Wang Guirong,a staff member of a state organ,did not perform his duties in accordance with the law in the trial work and mistakenly identified the facts of the case.The case Yu Zhehai was wrongly pursued legal responsibility.Causing the interests of the country and the people to suffer heavy losses,their actions have constituted dereliction of duty." This result has aroused strong reactions from all walks of life to issues such as the criteria for the identification of wrong cases and how to pursue responsibility,especially among judges in grassroots courts.This article will discuss the case of former judge Wang Guirong 's dereliction of duty and discuss the fate of the group of judges and the development direction of the system of lifelong responsibility for the quality of cases.Only if the problem is really discovered and solved will our judges not be afraid and treat the trial as a dangerous wall.When judges have a sense of security,they will devote themselves fully to the trial and truly realize that "the people feel fair and just in every case."...