| With the continuous advancement of Internet technology,the role of the Internet in people’s lives is becoming increasingly important.The establishment of the Hangzhou Internet Court is a successful example of the combination of the Internet and the rule of law,which provides valuable experience and fresh samples for building a new form of justice that is suitable for the era of the rule of law in the network.Subsequently,the establishment of Internet courts in Beijing and Guangzhou has greatly promoted the development of Internet courts.The internet trial mechanism is still new,and its particularity is reflected in its trial mode of "online trial as a principle and offline trial as an exception",which is a subversion and innovation of the traditional court trial mode.Compared with traditional courts,Internet courts have many special features.In the level of evidence law,they are mainly reflected in the huge differences in the rules of admissibility of electronic evidence.Based on this,this article conducts research around the electronic evidence admissibility rules of the Internet courts,and proposes an effective solution to the electronic evidence admissibility rules under the Internet trial mode based on the existing regulations.In addition to the introduction and conclusion,the body of this article is divided into three parts:The first part is an overview of Internet courts and electronic evidence rules.The basic situation of Internet courts and the particularities compared with traditional courts are introduced.Electronic evidence is also a new type of independent evidence.Compared with other types of evidence,there are many particularities.It is this particularity.The acceptance of electronic evidence has become an urgent problem to be studied and solved in the judicial practice of Internet courts.The second part is the dilemma and challenge of the Internet court’s rules of electronic evidence acceptance.The electronic evidence of the Internet court is special in terms of evidence collection,cross-examination and court review.The newly revised "Some Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures" at the end of 2019 have made new provisions on the types of electronic evidence,the determination of originals,and the rules of authenticity judgment,etc.,which can be regarded as rules on electronic evidence that have been increasingly discussed in recent years.A certain degree of response has been made in legislation,but it is still at the stage of crossing the river by feeling the stones.In fact,there are still many difficulties and challenges in the application of electronic evidence in practice,especially the lack of a unified and effective electronic evidence rule system,and the lack of legal projection of new technology means.On the basis of summarizing the experience inside and outside the domain,this paper summarizes and analyzes the problems existing in the acceptance of electronic evidence by Internet courts.The third part is the way to resolve the problem of electronic evidence acceptance in Internet courts.The resolution of the problem of the adoption of electronic evidence in Internet courts requires the improvement of the existing system of rules for the collection of electronic evidence in Internet courts,the exploration of establishing rules for the adoption of credibility in line with the characteristics of Internet courts,the emphasis on the particularity of the distribution of burden of proof and the introduction of new technologies such as blocks Chain technology enhances the verification of electronic evidence,etc. |