Collusion Hypocrisy Indicates The Extent To Which An Action Is Invalid

In this paper,we study behavior caused by false conspires said invalid content includes the scope of the main argument for conspires said hypocritical behavior analysis of the legal concept through seeks the hypocrisy said the effectiveness of the behavior and the different legal consequences caused by different academic views and zhongtong seeks the hypocrisy in the judicial practice said where applicable mainly several aspects of behavior and so on the article main body is divided into three main parts,first of all,starting from the concept analysis of conspires said hypocritical behavior of legal concept through to the false conspires said malicious collusion behavior and legal forms to cover illegal purposes Unilateral hypocrisy said the distinction between the similar behavior such as contrast to accurately define conspires hypocrisy said second,on the basis of the intention theory further analysis seeks the invalid reasons for false expression behavior,further distinguish between relatively ineffective and absolutely invalid disciplinary action and burden related disputes analysis conspires to be null and void,the legal consequences caused by false expression behavior especially the impact on the interests of the third person Finally,theory must becombined with practice,and on the basis of practice,select typical cases to analyze how the behavior of conspiracy false expression is applicable in different cases,and further clarify the applicable scope of conspiracy false expression behavior through the analysis of different types of cases...