Font Size: a A A

A Comparative Study Of The Attack Between China And Japan, South Korea And Australia In The Group Stage Of The Asian Champions League In 2016

Posted on:2019-12-21Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Q X LiFull Text:PDF
GTID:2417330542999500Subject:Physical Education and Training
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In 2014 from the Asian champions league club for east Asia division division,the Chinese super league team will no doubt be assigned to the division of east Asia,which according to the power threat to Chinese team’s biggest rival is from Japan,South Korea,Australia team.The end of an effective attack must be the end of a shot,and the main effective offense of a team can be understood by analyzing the offense of a team forming a shot.In this paper,using the method of literature study,video observation,mathematical statistics and logical analysis,as China,Japan and South Korea in 2016 afc champions team Australia formed four national team a total of 48 games shooting attack situation as the research object.Through comparing the formation of the show in the game shooting attack characteristics,discovery china-japan-rok andaustralia team in sports and set pieces form a shot of distinction on offense.Through comparative analysis,it is found that:1.China,Japan and South Korea team formed in mobile warfare attack of the shots were similar,the Australian team is significantly lower,set-pieces attack China and South Korea formed team shot more,Japan and Australia team is less.2.The launch area of the Chinese team’s offensive is dominated by the center front,where the offensive against the south Korean and south Korean teams in the previous field is relatively small.In terms of the way to get the ball,there is little difference between China,Japan and South Korea.The Australian team takes the ball as the main goal,and there is little difference in the way of getting the ball in each court.3.The attack in the stage of development,the Chinese team forward route is given priority to with direct approach,Japan and South Korea to Australia team is given priority to with edge in combining propulsion,the main propulsion of ground attack.The advance within 10 m is the main thrust displacement of China,Japan and South Korea,and the Japanese and Australian teams are slightly higher than China and South Korea in the 60 m push for long displacement.4 average advancing Chinese teams each district is unavailable and the number of passes are less,and 80% in the front of the offensive driving within 3 times passing,completed within 10 seconds,the attack in the midfield area by passing,mainly in 1-5 times in 6-25 seconds,the back area of attack mainly in 1-7 times or more than 11 times pass,during 11-20 seconds or more than 31 seconds to complete.South Korean teams have fewer times and fewer passes.The Australian team had a lot of times and passes in the frontcourt,and in the lower court,the Japanese teams had the longest time and the longest passes.Cross,through-ball,dribbling breakthrough,long shots and wall type is the formation of the champions league group shot attack the main tactics,China,Japan and South Korea team in crosses and through-ball utilization ratio is higher,the Australian team mainly use dribbling breakthrough.5.The five and three areas of the middle road area are the main shooting areas,while the Chinese and south Korean teams have scored the goal directly after the goal,while the Australian team is mainly responsible for the shooting.The Chinese team had a relatively good attacking ability in the first 15 minutes of the game,but was less than 15 minutes before the end of the game.6.In the use of set-pieces,Chinese teams have more direct shots than any other team.China,Japan and South Korea team corner long arc within and outside the curves were similar,the Australian team is given priority to with in the long arc,Japan and South Korea team better corner passing and application situation,China and Australia team to use less.
Keywords/Search Tags:Asian champions league, China, Japan and South Korea, Attack, A comparative study
PDF Full Text Request
Related items