| Basketball rules are the standard of conduct and actions of players in basketball games,It is also the guiding ideology and legal documents of the officials in the judged.The international basketball federation(FIBA)approved a series of rule changes at May 2017 and set the rules to take effect on October 1 of that year.This rule change has greatly modified the violation of traveling and the unsportsmanlike foul,except for the violation of traveling and the unsportsmanlike foul,there are a few minor changes.The special regulations and interpretation of the 2017-2018 CBA season will introduce all these changes,this paper takes the influence of <Special regulations and explanations of CBA league in 2017-2018 season>to the officials judged as the research object,used research methods like Literature review,expert interview,logic analysis,video observation,mathematical statistics,case analysis.Counted the data of traveling,unsportsmanlike foul,IRS system,draw these conclusion:1.The modification of walking with the ball makes professional basketball players use more diversified technical actions.At the beginning of the regular season of CBA league in 2017-2018,some referees failed to adapt to the new rules of walking with the ball.The reason mainly lies in that the referees did not fully adapt to the penalty scale and method of the new rules in the early stage of the regular season,did not form the image memory of the technical action after the change of the new rules,and the old penalty habit still exists.The referee for the "one foot continuous landing" with the ball go violation sensitivity is not high,will be habitually missed in the ruling.2.During the CBA regular season of 2017-2018,the referee was too sensitive to the penalty of violating the C3 clause of sports spirit foul,resulting in wrong judgment.In the whole season,the penalty scale of the same game is inconsistent,and the penalty scale of different games is inconsistent.The purpose of the rule change is to reduce tactical fouls and disrupt the smooth running of the game.However,neither the players nor the referees have adapted to the new rule after the change,instead,the number and duration of game interruption have increased.At the beginning of the regular season,the referees did not unify the penalty scale for violating the C3 clause of sports spirit fouls.After the sixth round of the regular season,CBA issued "the new rules interpretation on“The interpretation of the new rules on traveling and unsportsmanlike foul”,which made the referees further understand the C3 clause correctly and the penalty accuracy increased.3.The use of the instant review system makes the decisions made by the referee in the field more accurate and ensures that the referee can be as close as possible to the facts on the critical decisions.Making a decision through video replay can improve the referee's correct rate and reduce the rate of missed decision.However,the referee should avoid relying too much on the instant replay system in the execution of the match.The use of the instant replay system for many times and the excessive pursuit of the penalty accuracy will lead to the extension of the game time and the interruption of the game rhythm.4.The referee at the beginning of the regular season is not regulated the ball go violation and violation of sports spirit foul C3 terms and conditions of the scale,the regular season CBA company released after 6 round "about" the ball away "and"violations body foul 'new rules to explain "the umpire calls and significant scale,provides the referees on-the-spot of board cut decisions more clear guidance,make the ball go violation foul,violation of sports spirit decision accuracy improvement. |
PDF Full Text Request