A Comparative Study Of Expelling Students And Candidates For Unified Examination In Their Professional Learning Investment And Harvest

At present,the selection method of academic postgraduates in China is mainly to recommend a dual-track system combining exemption from examination and national unified examination.This dual-track parallel postgraduate recruitment system has Chinese characteristics and highly combines with China's national conditions,and plays an important role in the selection of postgraduates at this stage.To some extent,the future trend of the admission system for academic postgraduates in China is determined by the specific effect of the exemption system and the unified examination system.Therefore,this paper evaluates the current academic postgraduate entrance examination system by analyzing the professional learning input and learning harvest of the talents selected by the two systems during the school period to measure the specific implementation effect of different selection systems.Taking the academic postgraduate students of H University as an example,this paper adopts a set of questionnaires to investigate the differences in professional learning input and harvest between the two groups.In a sense,this can be used as evidence and Discussion on the enrollment of academic postgraduate students in China.A basis for the performance of the promotion system can also be used to reflect on and track the evaluation of the current academic postgraduate entrance examination system in China.It is found that there is no significant difference in the overall professional learning input and achievement between the exempted students and the general candidates during their postgraduate period.The exempted students only score higher in academic challenge than the general candidates,while the general candidates score higher in other dimensions than the general candidates.Secondly,when comparing the mean value and variance of professional learning input between the exempted students of different genders and the unified candidates,it is found that there are significant differences in the richness of cooperative learning and educational activities between the two groups.There are also significant differences in the cooperative learning between the exempted students of different disciplines and the unified candidates,but there is no significant difference between the exempted candidates of different grades and the unified candidates.Althoughthe scores of the exempted students are lower than those of the unified candidates in the dimension of professional learning input,the average score of the exempted students in professional gains is greater than or equal to that of the unified candidates.According to the research results,this paper puts forward the following suggestions:the system of waiver and exemption should go hand in hand with the national unified examination and escort the system of enrollment for postgraduates;postgraduates and higher educators should pay attention to the investment and investigation of professional learning;schools should also try to meet the development needs of different types of students to improve the quality of postgraduate education.