| The "48-hour clause" of the "Work-related Injury Insurance Regulations" is widely criticized because of the lack of general clauses in the identification of work-related injuries,rather than the reasons for the"48-hour clause".The "48-hour clause" is reasonable and should be maintained.The value orientation of the“48-hour clause"should be the welfare clause when the work injury identification is unknown.It can protect the laborer when the evidence is difficult.In order to solve the moral crisis existing in the identification of existing work injuries,a general clause should be added.as long as the worker's casualties have the relationship with work,they should be identified as work-related injuries. |