A Comparative Study Of "anti-expectation" Discourse Markers In China And South Korea

From the perspective of participants' expectations,the language components of di scourse have three kinds of information,such as "expected information","anti-expecta tion information" and "neutral information".If there is some implicit information in t he context,and this information is contrary or inconsistent with the information expe cted by the speaker and the listener,the "anti-expectation" pragmatic function will be generated." geuleonde" and "??" in discourse as discourse markers,expressing th e speaker's subjective attitude and emotional reaction,and has anti expected discourse function.In this paper,from the discourse level,on the basis of modern Korean and modern Chinese corpus,with the expected discourse markers "geuleonde" and "??" as the center,to study the morphology,syntax,pragmatics,and other functions,i n order to analyze the "geuleonde" and "??" the pragmatic functions.The position of discourse markers in the article are relatively free,including "g euleonde" accounted for the proportion is 95.9%,while the "??" total sentence rat io is 39.7%.From morphological point of view,"geuleonde" in Korean,in the for m of composite flexible use in oral language,but not for "??"."geuleonde" in Ko rean and "yo" often together respect,"??" in Chinese and particles combined "?,?,?",often appear in the spoken language.From Korea language expression chara cteristic by contrast," geuleonde " and "??" on the pragmatic functions have chan ge the subject,import topics,connected topics,interrupted,and other functions."??" in Chinese,however,the function of the connection issue more," geuleonde " i n Korean-has-urged the function of the topic,and "??" almost without its function.From the discourse function point of view," geuleonde " and "??" have added,pr edict,connections,interpretation,emphasis on,deepen,and other functions.Language behavior depends on a certain context,and the counter-expectation mainly appears in the context of the relationship between opposition,supplement,inclusion,unexpected fact and internal influence.