Font Size: a A A

Principles, prescriptions and polemics: Regulating conflicts of interest in the Canadian investment fund industry

Posted on:2009-01-30Degree:LL.MType:Thesis
University:University of Toronto (Canada)Candidate:Awrey, DanielFull Text:PDF
GTID:2446390002497931Subject:Law
Abstract/Summary:
Conflicts of interest permeate the Canadian investment fund industry. In response, securities regulators have promulgated National Instrument 81-107 Independent Review Committee for Investment Funds. In the view of securities regulators, NI 81-107 reflects a "principles-based" approach toward the regulation of conflicts of interest. This paper articulates a theoretical conception of principles-based securities regulation, one which transcends the formalism of the traditional "rules" versus "principles" debate to reveal a new regulatory paradigm. Thereafter, this paper explores whether and to what extent NI 81-107 truly reflects this principles-based paradigm, manifesting the potential to tap into its inherent wisdom while at the same time minimizing its potential drawbacks. Having reaped the fruits of this exploration, this paper concludes with a series of normative proposals respecting how securities regulators should approach both the regulation of conflicts of interest under NI 81-107 and, more broadly, the design of future principles-based regulatory mechanisms.
Keywords/Search Tags:Interest, Conflicts, NI 81-107, Investment, Securities regulators, Principles-based
Related items