Font Size: a A A

From 'designer babies' to 'deformer babies': Should reproductive choices be a matter for legal regulation

Posted on:2010-08-15Degree:LL.MType:Thesis
University:University of Toronto (Canada)Candidate:Nguyen, Thu MinhFull Text:PDF
GTID:2446390002987456Subject:Biology
Abstract/Summary:
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis provides parents with the opportunity to select the kind of child they will have. Because parents have this increased control over reproductive choices, this has ultimately changed discussions concerning reproductive rights and autonomy. Recently, deaf parents have argued for the right to use PGD in order to select deaf children. The aim of this thesis is to demonstrate that the right to choose or select a "deaf" embryo is a personal choice that is protected under broader reproductive interests. This right cannot be interfered with by society unless there is harm to others. I conclude that reproductive decisions, even if thought to be going against what is commonly accepted as "normal" conduct, and if these decisions do not harm others, should not be left for the public to examine and evaluate. Rather, reproductive decisions should be left squarely in the hands of the individuals in question.
Keywords/Search Tags:Reproductive
Related items