| The role and importance of hope in Kierkegaard's work has received little attention. One typically sees hope mentioned only in passing, related to central Kierkegaardian themes---as a mere description of faith, or as a way to illustrate what is lost in certain forms of despair. Rarely does one see hope discussed on its own terms, as having its own place in Kierkegaard's thought. This is a significant oversight. When we look closely at certain texts we see that hope is more than a mere descriptor associated with core concepts in the narrative. It is not a term only to be understood by its relation to more central themes, but it is a theme in its own right---a concept through which other core notions can be explained. In short, hope is an essential element of Kierkegaard's framework, and it plays a crucial role in some of the most important features of his thought: despair, faith and the self.;My thesis is that hope is an essential thread that connects despair, faith and the self. To show this I reconstruct Kierkegaard's theory of hope, which involves the distinction between mundane and authentic hope, and I make three principal claims. First, while despair involves the absence of hope, a rejection of oneself, and a turn away from one's relation to God, despair is fundamentally an unwillingness to hope. This unwillingness is directed toward authentic hope, conceived of by Kierkegaard as an expectation for the possibility of the good. Second, hope is not simply an ancillary activity of the self; rather, the task of becoming a self is essentially constituted by hope. Thus, when in despair one is unwilling to hope, one is in fact rejecting one's task of becoming a self. Third, faith stands in opposition to despair precisely because it is a willingness to hope. An essential role of faith is to secure the ground for hope, and in this way faith secures the ground for the self. In short, authentic hope is not merely a fringe element, but is essential to Kierkegaard's project of the self. |
