| This paper presents a comparative study between scientific theory and practice in the field of emotional intelligence (EI). The body of scientific theory can be divided into two main schools of thought. The purist position, supported by Salovey, Mayer and colleagues, states that emotional intelligence is an "ability" similar to spatial or verbal skills which have long been recognized as markers of human intelligence. The more popular "mixed" models, supported by Goleman, Bar-On and others, combine emotional processing with other aspects of personality such as optimism, persistence and zeal. It is the more popular "mixed" models that are predominantly being applied in practice. A thematic analysis of the scientific and popular literature reveals that there exists a split between scientific theory and practice in the field of EI. Suggestions for closing these gaps will result in a more integrated 'theory into practice' relationship in the field of EI. |
