Font Size: a A A

Sustainable management of natural rangeland ecosystems

Posted on:2012-01-25Degree:Ph.DType:Thesis
University:University of Alberta (Canada)Candidate:Montenegro-Ballestero, JohnnyFull Text:PDF
GTID:2463390011465011Subject:Agriculture
Abstract/Summary:
Rangelands, an ecosystem widespread in Canada, are important source of land for animal production. Around 26 million ha are utilized for beef production and in Alberta this ecosystem accounts for 6.6 million ha providing up to 50% of total forage for livestock.;To improve our understanding of how topography and grazing influence the nutrient cycling in a semiarid grassland, in the first part of my thesis I investigated the effect of those two factors on litter decomposition through a field experiment. The results showed that topography affected shoot litter decomposition -was faster downslope, and associated with greater soil moisture-, and that grazing by altering litter chemical composition influenced its decomposition; the lignin content in the litter was linked with the remaining mass.;I also investigated topography and grazing effect on plant and soil carbon stock through the ecosys, a comprehensive mathematical model for natural and managed ecosystems. Ecosys modeled, as found in the field, a topographic effect on total aboveground plant carbon which was greater down slope, which was explained by better soil conditions at lower topographic location.;Simulated carbon balance under current climate showed that uplands independently of grazing, was net carbon source, and opposite to the condition found at lower locations. The average carbon balance without grazing from 2003 to 2005 showed that low and medium elevations were carbon sinks of 132 and 12 g C m-2 y-1 respectively, but adjacent uplands released 4 g C m-2 y-1. Simulated grazing reduced net biome productivity at all topographic locations (35, 37 and 51 g of C m -2 y-1) and upper and middle elevations were carbon sources, but low elevation was still carbon sink (81 g m-2 y-1).;Under climate change soil organic carbon increased more without (13, 9, and 15g m-2 y-1) than with grazing (10, 5, and 11g m-2 y-1 at upper, middle, and lower topographic locations), but all locations were carbon sink.;There was concluded that, if properly set, grazing will not turn into carbon source this grassland ecosystem, which will be benefit by climate change.
Keywords/Search Tags:Ecosystem, Carbon, Grazing, Source, M-2 y-1
Related items