Research On The Relationship Between Science And Rationality From The Perspective Of Basic Ontology

In modern times,science has become a trusted way of interpreting the world and predicting the future,and the traditional method of conducting research with definite propositions as a starting point has also become the mainstream of the world.Descartes’ philosophy,which has a deep connection with this phenomenon,has gradually concealed the discussion of existing problems while promoting the development of natural sciences.It is true that Descartes et al.’s work to put the subjectivity of "truth" before people’s eyes is great,but their philosophical system also clearly shows a tendency of "either one or the other" dualistic view of truth.If people’s questioning stage of "existence" has a coordinating position for the so-called "scientific rationality" method,then those who equated the theory of natural science as "truth" in the past seem to have fallen into a certain kind of falsehood as true.In view.Viewed in this way,all people’s use of "existence" seems to have entered a self-evident environment.After entering the 20 th century,many philosophers have keenly discovered this problem.Heidegger took time as his vision and showed us an ontological structure that is different from the traditional truth structure,that is,the basic ontological perspective..This visual threshold itself can correspond to the realm of "birth and life".On the one hand,it points out the finiteness and transcendence of Dasein itself,and on the other hand,it clarifies that people need to awaken from the state of daily care and break through to death.The fear of showing their own existence.As a result,science as the foundation of science cannot be a rational framework constructed with so-called deterministic propositions,but should be regarded as a manifestation of the meaning of existence at the expense of life.In the historical process of investigating rationality as a deterministic proposition,we found that Kant is the most conscious and humble inheritor.He is one of the few people who enters the time horizon and consciously limits the scope of the objects of natural science.Although his theory is limited to specific times,this does not prevent us from following his ideas to interpret.In this process,we discovered that the humanities always unconsciously apply the form of natural science,and rely on the reality of science and technology to go astray to the loss of the function of discourse itself.Finally,after deconstructing the traditional scientific form of deterministic propositions as the only way,the subject itself naturally needs to bear corresponding responsibilities for its own free choice.After the person in the world loses all the ready-made meaning of himself,that is,after entering the link of intuitive experience,the uncertain future facing the self itself is also revealed.Faced with this familiar and unfamiliar scene,the self must go through a more cruel struggle to construct an authentic reality as a whole.In the end,the self realizes its existence in the truth in this real life scene.