| Public cultural institutions refer to the libraries and museums that generally provide cultural products and services for the whole society.They are the production and supply entities with the characteristics of public welfare,sociality and sharing.They belong to the institutions with full financial allocation.Under the background of traditional public management theory,the government is the main body to solve the problem of public cultural services.However,with the progress of society and the change of the times,a series of problems have emerged in the government’s arranged mode:the management of public cultural institutions is not divided,the efficiency is not high,the vitality is insufficient,the public participation rate is low,and the supervision mechanism is not perfect.Therefore,with the transformation of government functions,public institutions and cultural system are also undergoing reform.Drawing on the mature governance experience of foreign countries,according to the idea of "separation of government and business,separation of management and operation",the state proposed to establish a corporate governance structure for cultural institutions in 2013.The Ministry of culture and tourism(formerly the Ministry of Culture)issued an official document in 2014,advocating the establishment of a Council to broaden the talents,With the participation of various representatives in cultural management,the reform of corporate governance structure of China’s public cultural institutions has officially entered the public field of vision.By initiating reforms,public cultural institutions can have a clearer relationship with party and government departments,clarify their responsibilities,implement their own legal person autonomy,standardize governance models,liberate talents,stimulate vitality and motivation,promote innovation,and continuously improve operational efficiency and management Level and quality of service.According to the principal-agent theory,new public management theory and stakeholder theory,using the methods of questionnaire survey,interview,case analysis and other research methods,combined with six reform examples,such as provincial Shandong Museum,Shandong painting academy,municipal Jinan Cultural Museum(former Jinan Mass Art Museum),Linyi library,county-level Feicheng cultural Museum and boxing Cultural Museum,this paper studies the reform of Shandong Province Reform of corporate governance structure of provincial public cultural institutions.First of all,it combs the general situation of the reform work at the provincial,municipal and county levels,especially the preparation and establishment of the Council,and summarizes its work results.Secondly,it analyzes the existing problems in the reform of corporate governance structure of public cultural institutions in Shandong Province,that is,the role of the Council is not obvious,the reform power is insufficient,the continuation of the traditional management mode and the participation of social forces is not enough.Third,the causes of these problems are identified,that is,the Council’s own positioning is not strong,the supporting system is not perfect,the lack of game and incentive mechanism of stakeholders.Fourth,the paper selects Jiangsu Province,Zhejiang Province,Shanghai City,Guangdong Province and other provinces and cities in the eastern coastal areas as the comparative research objects,and summarizes their desirable reform experience.Finally,it puts forward suggestions on how to improve the corporate governance structure of public cultural institutions in Shandong Province:first,strengthen the self construction of the Council;second,improve the relevant supporting system;third,build a complete and effective system of internal and external supervision;fourth,attach great importance to public participation,and provide reference for the improvement of corporate governance structure of public cultural institutions in other similar areas,so as to explore the ways to meet the needs The reform of China’s national conditions can better stimulate the internal vitality of public cultural institutions,improve the efficiency of public cultural services,and meet the people’s growing needs for a better life. |
