A Comparative Study On The Synonyms And Short Verbs Of "Damaged Meaning"

Through finding out all the long and short verbs with mutual definitions in Modern Chinese Dictionary(7th Edition),and selecting the same semantic category of the long and short verbs,namely "damaged sense" type of long and short verbs: "punish","cheat","raking","seize","rob","rob" and "steal".In view of this kind of verb significance exist great similarities in form,length,and found that they can sometimes replace,sometimes can’t replace,to illustrate "damaged" class difference,length of verb from the word meaning,syntax,pragmatics,four aspects were analyzed,the rhythm,and find out the cause of the differences,in order to reveal the relationship between words and words long,to examine the role of Chinese syllables.The research of this paper is mainly divided into four parts,and each part of the investigation Angle has its own emphasis,but in the content is related.The details are as follows:The first chapter is the introduction.Mainly in terms of research purposes,scope of research,research methods and the source of language data,and at the same time,it makes a detailed overview of the research status of short and short verbs and monosyllabic verbs.Through the previous research,it is found that the discrimination of the differences between long and short verb phrases is not meticulous and accurate.Many studies are about the description of coarse particles,which is not strong academically and practicality.Some theoretical studies,such as the relationship between prosody and syntactic semantics,are often not based on a survey of a wide range of facts,so the scientific nature of their conclusions has yet to be verified by facts.The second chapter mainly discusses the semantic contrast and interchangeability of long and short verbs from two aspects: the study of the meaning and the meaning of the same,the meaning and the interchangeability.Through the interpretation of "damaged meaning" in Modern Chinese Dictionary(7th edition),it is found that they have great commonality.In equipping object argument: when the length of the verb with the object of patient argument,generally can replace each other,both in the belt complement level: when is complement verb with the length of time,amount-complement and complement to complement,they also have replaceability;Finally,when the two drive the word auxiliary word "liao,guo",in addition to the difference in the frequency of use,they can also be replaced under normal circumstances.The third chapter describes the difference of the ininterchangeability and syntactic function of long and short verbs.Mainly through the length of the verb predication ingredient and the predication of non-replaceable,its performance predication composition differences in both the equipping object,belt,short rod form a predicate complement components,the differences between the parallel phrase,and the predication differences mainly through the length of the verb as the subject,object,attributive,embodied in the language center.It is also found that short words can take result argument,way argument,result complement and state complement,while long words can’t take result argument and complement,which are related to transitivity and bounded.In contrast,long words as predicate components are not restricted in any way,which is influenced by the referentialization of long and short verbs.The fourth chapter elaborates the difference of long and short verbs from the aspect of style and prosody.Firstly,this paper studies the pragmatic differences of short and short verbs with impaired meanings through "word selection","register distribution" and "sentence type distribution",that is,short words tend to be colloqual,while long words tend to be written.Secondly,by analyzing the prosodic collocation of the verb-object structure(" 1+1 ","1+2","2+1","2+2")and the biased structure("1+1 ","1+2","2+1","2+2"),it is found that the "2+1" and "1+2" in the verb-object structure and the biased structure are often untenable,and some of them can not be explained by prosody,but are affected by syntactic function and semantic collocation.The fifth chapter is the conclusion.This paper summarizes the previous viewpoints and contents,and points out the shortcomings of the paper and the prospect of future research.