| From the perspective of the actual situation,the destruction of intangible cultural heritage is not rare,but the number of lawsuits filed against it is very small,which does not mean that China’s intangible cultural heritage project maintenance is in place.Now very quickly,economic and social development all over the world more and more closely,the relation between the intangible cultural heritage of our country faces a bigger threat,so,we must promote and maintain the intangible cultural heritage projects in our country,the key is to improve the strength in the preservation of intangible cultural heritage projects,but in China,intangible cultural heritage projects procedure remains to be improved,including the experts judgment for the plaintiff qualifications(different point of view.In the intangible cultural heritage protection project,the identification of the plaintiff qualification is very critical,but the existing law does not clearly explain the plaintiff qualification of the intangible cultural heritage.Some laws mentioned the non-material cultural heritage lawsuit the plaintiff’s qualification to determine the content of the project,but only to the case has "direct stakes" can be judged to be the plaintiff,can for the body of the other as the plaintiff lawsuit in law the provisions of this part of the blank,the author tries to explore a suitable for the protection of the intangible cultural heritage litigation mode,the non-material cultural heritage litigation of the plaintiff qualification problem.This paper roughly selects literature research method,theoretical elaboration,empirical analysis and other means to establish the overall structure of "introduction--body--conclusion".The body is divided into four parts.The first chapter explains the relevant knowledge of the plaintiff’s qualification of intangible cultural heritage in general,including the source of the plaintiff’s litigation right,the interest to be protected by the litigation requirements,and the protection of the social interests of the intangible cultural heritage project.Chapter two puts forward the current problems in the identification of plaintiff’s qualification in litigation in intangible cultural heritage projects.Chapter three puts forward some Suggestions to improve the plaintiff’s qualification in litigation of China’s intangible cultural heritage projects. |