| This article takes the country’s key poverty eradication battle into a crucial period of success.The government’s precision poverty alleviation performance evaluation has generally introduced a third-party evaluation mechanism as a background.It attempts to start from the perspective of stakeholders,and uses the third-party precision poverty alleviation third-party evaluation as a practical case in county A of province A.The main stakeholders in the third-party evaluation of precision poverty alleviation are studied: the government of the client,farmers,and third-party evaluation agencies based on their own interest claims.And put forward corresponding countermeasures accordingly.This article mainly adopts the qualitative research method.The qualitative data mainly comes from the interview data with the third-party appraisers,the government administrators of the entrusting party,and the farmer households when the author participates in the third-party assessment of accurate poverty alleviation in County Z,Province A,and the data collected during the assessment.Related first-hand information.The main content of this article can be divided into four parts.The first part is the first two chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces the research background,significance,research ideas,methods and generalization of the previous literature,the second chapter introduces the relevant concepts and theoretical basis,mainly introduces the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation Relevant concepts of current status and stakeholder theory and their applicability;the second part is Chapter III,Chapter IV and Chapter V.The content of the three chapters is to study the independence and objectivity of the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation based on the "adverse selection" game behaviors of the principal government,farmers and third-party assessment agencies as the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation based on their own interests.,Professionalism,impartiality,authority and other characteristics of the impact and limitations are the actual difficulties created by the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation;the third part is Chapter VI,which includes four aspects: ideology,system,information disclosure,and public supervision.The following aspects comprehensively propose corresponding countermeasures for solving the dilemma of the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation;the final chapter is the conclusion part,which is the fourth part of this paper.This part believes that the main stakeholders of the three parties have eliminated the independence of the third-party assessment of precision poverty alleviation during the interest game.The characteristics of objectivity,objectivity,professionalism,impartiality,and authority have created a real dilemma for the third-party assessment of accurate poverty alleviation.It is necessary to propose corresponding countermeasures against its real dilemma.Finally,it analyzes the innovations and deficiencies of this article and makes Prospects for the third-party assessment of China’s accurate poverty alleviation.This article aims to improve the current third-party assessment mechanism for the accurate poverty alleviation in ethnic areas in China from a new perspective,for the development and innovation of the theoretical basis for the third-party assessment in the area of poverty alleviation in our ethnic areas,to promote the modernization of government governance capabilities and governance systems,and to help 2020 China has won the tough fight against poverty on schedule,and made suggestions and suggestions for building a well-off society in an all-round way. |