Administrative Regulation System Of Human Gene Editing Technology

As a new medical technology,human gene editing technology has great potential in the treatment of cancer,β-thalassemia and many genetic diseases.China also mentioned in the "13th Five-Year Plan" to strengthen the basic research and development and frontier layout of gene editing.However,at the same time of its leap-forward development,especially after the "gene editing baby" case,the accompanying risks have to alert us.For the purpose of protecting the interests of the subjects in the process of technological development,and in order to make the technology itself develop in a direction beneficial to the needs of the public interest,this paper,based on the analysis of the multidimensional risks of human gene editing technology and China’s administrative regulations,explores the future regulatory path of this technology.This article is divided into four parts.The first part is the introduction of the basic situation of the "gene editor baby" case.This paper briefly introduces the judgment and case of the "Gene Editing Baby" case,and puts forward two focuses of discussion in this case: one is the risks faced by the research and application of human gene editing technology,and the other is the specific situation of its administrative regulations in China.The second part carries on the first discussion focus proposed by the first department,analyzes and demonstrates its technical risks,ethical risks and social risks one by one on the basis of a brief introduction of human gene editing technology combined with this case,and conceives the basic mode of dealing with these risks in the future administrative law field of our country.That is to say,taking the demand for moral responsibility as the starting point,the regulation mode of principle prohibition and list type liberalization is adopted for gene editing.The third part specifically analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the administrative regulations on human gene editing technology in China.The fourth part,aiming at the problems found,combined with the conclusion of the second part,puts forward its own suggestions from the aspects of legislation and actual supervision.