Research On Kelson’s Theory Of Validity Of Law

Witness Testimony as a form of evidence required by the law of peoplel procedure,which effects in obtaining the truth,realizing the civil interests and deserved profits of the clients,social fairness and justice is unique.However,due to the instability of the object and the possibility of providing false testimony,witness testimony needs to be cross-examined more than other legal evidence.It is necessary for the person who appears at a trial to tell the truth verify the authenticity of the testimony and eliminate the false part in the testimony.Therefore,In this paper,we study the system is the key of the witness system.In October 2019,China has also made significant revisions to the evidence of civil proceedings.In particular,the system for People who know the truth participate in the trial has been optimized and refined on the basis of the original provisions,but the system still has shortcomings and needs to be improved.Taking Shenyang grass-roots court as the basis,the witness’ s testimony rate has been procured from the cases involving to witnesses and testify for data analysis.Thus,the rate of appearance,the adoption rate of court testimony of three datas,and data analysis,understand the system of witness to testify in the judicial practice present situation;Through the analysis of the case of Zhao Shiming and Pei Zehong’s private lending dispute,this paper explores the judge’s judgment criteria for accepting testimony in judicial practice.Therefore,I have suggestions for the improvement of the witness testifying system:first,improvementof the qualification of the witness;Second,the improvement of the rights and compulsory provisions of witnesses to testify in court;Third,the mechanism for accepting testimony from witnesses should be imporved.The aim is to establish a scientific standard,complete system and efficient system for witnesses to testify in court.