Research On The Discretionary Power Of Public Security Administrative Punishment

With the development of a society under the rule of law in my country,administrative discretion has become an important research object in administrative law,and it has become a trend of research and system construction to regulate administrative subjects to exercise administrative discretion.Public security organs are the main body of administrative law enforcement that maintains social public order,and have been given the corresponding administrative punishment discretion in accordance with the law.In order to realize the legality and rationality of the judgment results,the public security organs regulate the law enforcement activities of the people's police by formulating administrative penalty judgment standards.However,in practice,there are still many problems in the discretion of public security administrative punishment and related systems,leading to abuse of power.In order to regulate the exercise of the discretionary power of public security administrative punishments,we should start with the improvement of legislation,justice,supervision and benchmarks for public security administrative punishments,follow the value orientation of maintaining public order,improving administrative efficiency,and achieving fairness and justice,and clarify the uncertainty in the legislation.The concept of uncertainty,the formulation of standards for standardizing public security administrative punishment,the improvement of the rationality review system in judicial review,and the improvement of supporting systems,to maximize the role of administrative discretion in public security administrative punishment.