A Theoretical Study Of Marx's Pre-capitalist Social Formations

In the process of establishing historical materialism,Marx put forward important social formation theories,including the far-reaching "three social forms" theory and "five social forms" theory.Since Marx himself did not specifically discuss the division of these two social forms,these two kinds of division methods have always existed in the research process of social form theory There is a big controversy.Among them,the focus of controversy is on the distinction between the two concepts mentioned in Marx's original text: "social form" and "social economic form".The author believes that the relationship between these two concepts is actually the relationship between essence and phenomenon.Only by solving this conceptual problem can we better understand the relevance among the three different forms of ownership,namely,Asian,ancient and Germanic.In addition,from the perspective of the subject,that is,people,Marx attributed the pre capitalist society to "human dependent" society,so the difference between the three different forms of ownership is only the quantity difference,and does not reach the degree of qualitative change.Asian and Germanic forms of ownership are divided on the premise of "human dependence",belonging to the pre capitalist social form,which makes the two have certain homogeneity.In the process of modernization,backward countries can follow the capitalist road like Germanic ownership,and can also be typical of Russian and Chinese traditional society As the form of Asian ownership,China has taken the road of building a socialist country across the capitalist "Kaftin gorge".This paper attempts to analyze the similarities and differences of the three forms of ownership from the perspective of Marx's historical materialism,including Asian ownership,ancient ownership and Germanic ownership,so as to deepen the study of Marx's theory of social form.In addition,through the unity of history and logic,this paper combines Marx's social form theory with China's traditional society,so as to find a theoretical basis for the development of socialism with characteristics across the "Kafuding gorge" of capitalism.Specifically,it is carried out from the following three aspects:(1)This paper summarizes the controversial focus of Marx's theory of social form and analyzes it.(1)The traditional understanding of social form and social economic form is defined.(2)This paper discusses the concept of social form and social economic form.(3)This paper gives an answer to the relationship between social form and social economic form.(2)This paper makes a detailed analysis and comparison of the three forms of ownership before capitalism,and finds out their similarities and differences.(1)This paper analyzes and compares the relationship between people,people and things in the three forms of ownership.(2)Compare the differences among the three forms of ownership.(3)By comparing the similarities and differences between the three forms of ownership,the conclusion is that the three forms of ownership belong to a unified social form.(3)Explore the practical significance of the theory of the three social forms.(1)Compared with the five social forms,the three social forms are more representative.(2)This paper analyzes two ways of modernization of pre capitalist society.(3)This paper analyzes Marx's great idea of crossing the capitalist "Kaftin gorge" for Russia.(4)The theory of the three social forms provides a theoretical basis for our unswervingly taking the road of characteristic socialism.