The Study Of Zang Lin’s Jing Yi Za Ji

Zang Lin was a scholar in the early Qing Dynasty.He was indifferent to fame and fortune,studied and governed the classics,wrote books behind closed doors,and was ignorant of the world."Jing Yi Za Ji" is an important work for us to explore the content of Zang Lin’s study of ConfucianismThe book "Jing Yi Za Ji" is a note taken by Zang Lin after reading the scriptures.There is no specific classification in each volume.This article is classified according to the thirteen scriptures.The content of the "Jing Yi Za Ji" is analyzed in turn.Zang’s achievements in the study of the classics of "The Book of Songs","Shangshu",Sanli,"Chunqiu" Three Zhuan,"Zhouyi","The Analects","Mencius" and "Book of Filial Piety".In the study of "The Book of Songs",Zang Lin mainly put forward two points:one is that Zheng Xuan’s "Mao Shijian" is actually a statement of "Mao Zhuan";the other is to textualize "Lu Shi","Qi Shi","Han Shi",The similarities and differences of the four poems,although the "Mao Shi",emphasizes that the three poems can be used as references to each other,and cannot be monopolized.In the study of "Shangshu",Zang Lin focused on researching the author of "Guwenshangshu" as Zheng Chong,and believed that the "Shangshu" cited in "Historical Records" kept "Guwenshangshu" but not all "Jinwenshangshu" In terms of the three rites,Zang Lin focused on the three books Yi Li","Zhou Li",and "Book of Rites".For "Yi Li",he focused on Zheng Xuan’s"Notes" in conjunction with the current ancient texts."On the side reiterated Zheng Xuan’s exegetical theory of famous things,and for " Book of Rites",it focused on the problem of correcting " Book of Rites " scriptures.In the"Chunqiu" Three Zhuan,Zang Lin criticized Fan Ning’s "Notes" for "explaining the scriptures are empty and sparse,and failed to invent the interpretation",criticized He Xiu’s "Notes" for "sticking to the rams,arrogant and superficial",and criticized Du Yu’s "Notes" "Well talk is superficial,it’s an exception."In the study of "Zhou Yi","Jing Yi Za Ji" is mostly based on Wang Bi’s comment on " Yi".In the study of "The Analects",Zang Lin put forward her own opinions on the basis of various commentaries.In the study of "Mencius",Zang Lin mainly supplemented and corrected Zhao Qi’s viewpoints in "Mengzi Chapters".In the study of "Book of Filial Piety ",Zang Lin mainly explained her own understanding of "filial piety".Zang Lin’s research on the contents of the various sutras involved shows some common characteristics,that is,the dredging of the meanings of the sutras is based on the perspectives of collation,text phonology,identification of forgeries,and compilation of lost.Specifically,there are mainly the following four In terms of:"editing the original texts,making corrections to preserve the truth","identifying the shape and analyzing the sound,explaining the meaning of the words","researching and treating ancient books,examining the authenticity",and "compiling the relics,and restoring the meaning of the book."The common features of "Jing Ti Za Ji" that pass elementary school,refined collation,and Zong Han Tang commentaries are quite the spirit of Qianjia Sinology.Since the Qing Dynasty,scholars have criticized each of them,or admitted that it was written by Zang Lin,which can be regarded as the forerunner of Qian-Jia Sinology;or thought that its descendants were forged,in fact,the product of Qian-Jia’s style of study.From the contradictions in the textual meaning of Zang Lin’s "Jing Yi Za Ji" according to the Song version and the "Jing Yi Za Ji",it is speculated that the"Jing Yi Za Ji" may have elements of its descendants,and it should be regarded as the style of Qianjia learning.Product,but the book’s academic value cannot be obliterated by the non-original part of the book.