| In recent years,against the background of the weakening of endogenous authority in rural governance,the decline of grassroots political power,and the de organization of farmers,"Xinxiang Xian",as a traditional rural governance resource,has received high attention from both political and academic circles.The participation of new rural elites in rural governance is to solve the plight of traditional rural governance.Studying their participation mechanisms and optimizing paths is of great significance to achieving rural revitalization.This article takes Xinxiang Xian in Deqing County as the main research object,using the research methods of literature analysis,regression analysis,and questionnaire survey,and based on collaborative governance theory and participatory governance theory,constructs a theoretical framework for Xinxiang Xian’s participation in rural governance.It believes that the supervision mechanism,collaborative mechanism,incentive mechanism,and security mechanism are the main factors that affect Xinxiang Xian’s participation in rural governance.Using factor analysis to extract five variables from the four mechanisms,including self motivation,social motivation,legal protection,social supervision,and negotiation and communication,regression analysis was used to verify the impact of the five variables on the frequency and effectiveness of Xinxiang Xian’s participation in rural governance,explore the effectiveness and problems encountered by Xinxiang Xian in the process of participation,and finally,propose the optimization path for Xinxiang Xian’s participation in rural governance mechanism.Through research,it is found that the supervision mechanism,incentive mechanism,coordination mechanism,and security mechanism are significantly positively correlated with the frequency and effectiveness of Xinxiangxian’s participation in rural governance.In the supervision mechanism,Xinxiang Xian is effectively supervised by the party organization,village committee,and villagers at three levels to prevent Xinxiang Xian from violating regulations and crossing boundaries.In the collaborative mechanism,as a "lubricant" between the two village committees and the villagers,it helps the two village committees effectively manage rural affairs,greatly improving operational efficiency;In the security mechanism,the improved welfare and policy guarantees have greatly increased the frequency of Xinxiangxian’s participation in rural governance;In the incentive mechanism,the construction of ancestral temples and rural cultural centers in the village has improved the cultural quality of the villagers and their sense of cultural identity with the Xinxiang sages,greatly increasing the enthusiasm of the Xinxiang sages.However,there are still many problems in the process of Xinxiang Xian’s participation in rural governance: the supervision system is not sound,and there are "offside" and "dislocation" phenomena in Xinxiang Xian’s participation in the new rural construction;The imperfect incentive mechanism has led to the low stability and worrying efficiency of Xinxiangxian’s work,leading to a significant decrease in Xinxiangxian’s enthusiasm;The immaturity of the security mechanism has led to a sharp increase in contradictions between the two village committees and the Xinxiang sages,resulting in the phenomenon of Xinxiang sages being "elevated".The coordination mechanism is not coordinated,and the work content of Xinxiang Xian and the village two committees is repetitive and cumbersome,resulting in a significant reduction in their work efficiency.Finally,according to the practical problems faced by Xinxiang Xian in participating in rural governance,relevant policies and opinions are given,including:completing the incentive mechanism for Xinxiang Xian to participate in rural governance;Reshaping the collaborative mechanism of the participation of new rural elites in rural governance;Improving the guarantee mechanism for the participation of new rural elites in rural governance;Strengthen the supervision mechanism for the participation of new rural elites in rural governance. |