Plea Guilty And Punished:Inspection And Application Of Proof Standards From A Broad Perspective

The reform of the leniency system for confessing guilt and punishing is not only the substantive continuation of the criminal policy of combining leniency and strictness,but also the procedurally systematic construction of the concept of simplification of litigation procedures.The implementation of the leniency system of confessing guilt and punishing has promoted the establishment of a pluralistic system of procedures,and it has shown an impact on the current criminal procedure legislation in judicial practice.It is a due manifestation of doubts about the application of criminal proof standards in the implementation of expedited procedures,and has become the problem of this reform.Around the purpose of accelerating light sentence processing and improving the efficiency of litigation,the diversified litigation system built by the system of confessing guilt and punishing leniency as well as the conformity of the prosecution and the defense are in line with the current law.The application of the statutory certification standards presented challenges.Under the practical dilemma of judicial application in the practice of system reform due to the statutory certification standards,through the inspection of the common law system of plea bargaining and the civil law system of plea bargaining,reducing the certification standards seems to be the key to the solution.However,based on the objective and truthful pursuit of litigation,through theoretical rebuttals and responses to litigation practice issues,it is clear that insisting on the application of statutory proof standards at this stage has important practical significance.Reviewing the implementation of the leniency system for confessing guilt and punishing,and realizing the accurate application of the statutory certification standards in cases of plea guilty and punishing leniency,it is inseparable from the improvement of the leniency system for plea guilty and punishing.Through the improvement of the system,it is possible to avoid the abuse of relying on confession under voluntary confession,and to clarify the duty of judges to review the facts of the case to ensure adherence to legal proof standards.