| The landmark event at the beginning of China’s fair competition review system was the Opinions on Establishing a Fair Competition Review System in the Market System issued by The State Council in 2016.The construction of fair competition review system is the inevitable result of economic development,and also the inflection point of competition policy and industrial policy who should become the basic policy of leading economic development.Although the fair competition review system began in 2016,its application in the field of government procurement still has some shortcomings today.The basic connotation of government procurement policy fair competition review system refers to the government procurement policy makers in the market participant economic activities of government procurement regulations,normative documents of government procurement and other government procurement policies and measures in the process,according to the established standards of their own or drafting policies and measures to limit competition evaluation,in order to make the policy measures to restrict competition before the is excluded or put forward reasonable alternatives,in order to make its conform to the requirements of the unified market and fair competition behavior.The fair competition review system of government procurement policy has the characteristics of the special review subject,the specific review object and the uniqueness of the review standard.The perfect fair competition review system of government procurement policy can effectively regulate the behavior of government procurement policy,strengthen the supervision mechanism of government procurement,and improve the use efficiency of government procurement funds.Although the fair competition review system has been introduced for many years,there are still problems in the development of specific review work by policy making organs in practice.In terms of legal basis,the review documents and standards of government procurement policies issued by various organs are complicated.Although in practice,China has established a fair competition review system framework in the four-level administrative system of countries,provinces,cities and counties,the review process of policy documents is not disclosed,and the work of the work at all levels is mostly publicized in the form of work summary.As a result,the existing government procurement policy fair competition review is lack of systematic and refined review standards,highly generalized review,lack of accountability,and broad and broad exceptions.The construction of perfect systematic review standards is of great significance to the fair competition review system of government procurement policy.The systematic and refined fair competition review standards are the premise of carrying out relevant work.The imperfect review standards make the fair competition review work of the review organs have no substantive significance.A clear definition of the application of the exception provisions of fair competition review of government procurement policy can effectively prevent the policy making organs from abusing the exception provisions to avoid the examination,give full play to the special system function of government procurement policy to the greatest extent,and reconcile the contradiction between competition policy and industrial policy.Relevant policy-making department open the procurement policy of superior documents and its department is responsible for the procurement policy fair competition review the specific responsibility of the main body,at the same time will review the process and results of online public policy authority to form effective social supervision,promote the government procurement policy making department administration according to law.The formal responsibility investigation system can not play a good role in promoting the fair competition review of the government procurement policy,so it is necessary to establish the fault responsibility investigation system and the interview system,and change the existing passive situation of responsibility investigation. |
