| The system of cross-jurisdiction case registration of civil litigation is not only an important solution to the problem of litigation between different cities for the party of civil case,but also a significant measure to perfect the cross-jurisdiction collaborative filing.This system bases on the upgraded achievement of the court’s information technology,breaks the inherent barriers between the divided jurisdiction of courts,breaks through the limits of time and space of traditional mode of offline filing.With the system,the masses need not to go to the courts in other cities that have the jurisdiction over their cases.They can choose a nearby court to complete the flow path of filing conveniently.At present,the construction of the system of cross-jurisdiction case registration of civil litigation has made great achievements.It has been implemented in four levels of courts all over the country.The courts in different places link to each other and work collaboratively,which strikingly raises the efficiency of the service for litigation of cases in different places and save much time and money for the plaintiff of civil cases.However,there are some defects in the operation of the system.To be concrete,the poor collaboration between different courts makes the effective operation of the system impossible.The insufficient design of its follow-up connection procedures makes it impossible to eliminate the party’s burden of litigation completely.The lack of preventive and punitive measures tends to cause the party’s malicious or improper litigation.Therefore,we should base on the party’s judicial demand who files litigations in different places,continue to probe into the system’s principle of universal application and intensify the quality and effect of service for filing in different places,and design a long-term mechanism for the system’s application in our country.In addition,we should continuously consolidate the achievement of the system of registration for placing a case on file and further eliminate the inconvenience caused by litigations in different places.Finally,we should meet the masses’ increasing diversified judicial demand and make them have more sense of gain in “the doorway” service of placing a case on file in different places. |