| Objective:1. To explore the efficacy of levoloxacin, terazosin, and their combination in patients with category â…¢ chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/ CPPS).2. To compare the therapeutic effect of category â…¢ A and category â…¢ B CP/ CPPS.3. Evaluation of the clinical value of category â…¢ CP in two subcategories:III A and â…¢ B.4.To investigate the pathogenesis of category â…¢ CP/CPPS.Materials and methods:1. A total of 115 patients with category â…¢ CP/CPPS receiving six-week therapy were randomly divided into the levofloxacin group (n= 38), terazosin group (n=38), and combination group (n=39). The endpoints were the response rate of the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5), expressed prostatic secretion-white blood cell (EPS-WBC), expressed prostatic secretion-small particle of lecithin (EPS-SPL), Maximum Flow Rate (MFR) and Average Flow Rate(AFR). After six weeks treatment, the data of related were compared before and after treatment.Results:1. After six weeks, the response rate of NIH-CPSI scores was 45.1%,22.4%, and 50.0% in the levofloxacin group, terazosin group, and combination group, respectively. There was significant difference between the levofloxacin group and terazosin group(P<0.01); There was significant difference between the terazosin group and combination group(P<0.01); There was no significant difference in NIH-CPSI scores was observed between the levofloxacin group and combination group (p>0.05).2. EPS-WBC counts in the levofloxacin group decreased from (13.4 ±4.6) to (6.8±2.9), terazosin group decreased from (12.7±4.3) to (10.1±3.8), while that of the combination group decreased from (12.6±4.4) to (6.0±2.3) Levofloxacin alone or levofloxacin plus terazosin could significantly reduce EPS-WBC counts compared with terazosin alone(P<0.05).3. IIEF-5 scores in the levofloxacin group before and after treatment were (10.8±2.9)ã€(16.1±4.4), terazosin group were (11.1±3.0)ã€(16.8±4.6), the combination group were (11.2 ±3.2)ã€(17.2±4.3) respectively, no significant difference was found between the three arms in terms of IIEF-5 scores (p>0.05).4. After six weeks, the MFR in the levofloxacin group increased from (16.1±5.8)ml/s to(19.3±6.1)ml/s, terazosin group increased from (16.5±6.3)ml/s to (20.1±6.7)ml/s, the combination group increased from (16.2±6.0)ml/s to (19.7±6.4)ml/s. There was no significant difference in the three arms (p>0.05).5. The AFR in the levofloxacin group before and after treatment were(8.3±3.4)ml/s and (9.9±3.3)ml/s, terazosin group were(8.0 ±3.1)ml/s and (10.1±3.2)ml/s, the combination group were(8.2±2.9)ml/s and (10.3 ±3.1)ml/s. There was no significant difference in the three arms(p>0.05).6. After six weeks, no significant difference in NIH-CPSI scores was observed between IIIA and IIIB patients in each arm(p>0.05).7. Furthermore, the changes in EPS-SPL counts was no significant difference according to subcategory in the three arms before and after treatment(p>0.05).Conclusion:1. A 6-week short-term treatment of levoloxacin or levoloxacin plus terazosin was more effective than terazosin alone in patients with category III CP/CPPS.2. levoloxacin treatment was not different from levoloxacin plus terazosin treatment in terms of treatment effect.3. There was no significant difference in the therapeutic effect of category â…¢A and category â…¢B prostatitis.4. According to EPS-WBC counts divided into category â…¢A and â…¢B is limited to diagnosis and treatment for category â…¢ prostatitis, the significance of the classification to be further explore. |