Research On Practice Of Chinese Marxist Literary Criticism

According to the practice of Marxism, the concept of practice has a highly inclusive characteristic. From the viewpoints of philosophy, practice is the essential power of human activity with sensibility and historic value creation activities. The object of value creation activities express subject and object, theory and reality, perception and rationality, motivation and passivity, limits and transcendence of dialectical unity of historic movements. The fundamental goal of practice is to constantly promote social harmony and good direction, eventually achieve man's all-round development. Literary criticism itself is a form of human subject practice. The process of literary criticism is to dialogue with the objective reality world by literature. And literary criticism also affects the course of history through literature. It can be said that Chinese morphology of Marxist literary criticism is the combination of specific practice and construction of the Marxist literary criticism and modern Chinese social reality. Chinese Marxist literary criticism is the result of combination of specific practice. The practice of connotation of Chinese Marxist literary criticism is constantly expanding and deepening in the historical evolution and embodiment, eventually shows its special cultural connotation and era characteristics. The practical connotation, characteristics of Chinese Marxist literary criticism mainly in the process of Sinicization of Marxism is to participate in the Chinese revolution, construction and embodied in the course of the practice of literary criticism. Besides introduction and conclusion, the full text of dissertation is divided into five chapters to discuss the thought connotation, the morphological characteristics of practice of Chinese Marxist literary criticism.The first chapter circumfuses the practice category of western practice and Marx's practice viewpoint in historical study. Aristotle was the first true concept into the practice philosophy thinking. In Aristotle's view, practice is the correct behavior itself constitute a purpose, it reflects the completely satisfactory completion and implementation of the event, that is to say, practice is good and good behavior. Itself, for the purpose of practice is based on behavior is related to the well-being of others and social activities, it is mainly refers to man's ethical behavior and political behavior. After Aristotle, Kant, Hegel and Feuerbach, have important practical ideas are put forward. Represented by Husserl, Heidegger's modern practice, makes a man of practice and ontology problem connecting up, will practice ascend to the height of the meaning of ontology. Generally speaking, the development history of western practice, not only has clear the history of the development, at the same time also has its problem framework is through transformation of complex evolving process. Inspects the practice of western history, so to speak, is the practice and existence, practice and rationality and freedom, practice, practice and theory, practice and the main body, the basic concept of history. Only in the history of Marx's practice philosophy there really the riddle of the nature of the practice, the establishment of Marx's practical materialism is the practice of western philosophical tradition inheritance and creative development.Revolutionary change of Marx's practice philosophy is embodied in three aspects:one is the fundamental change in the form of philosophy, namely, make the transition from theory to practice philosophy; The second is the fundamental change of thinking mode, namely the way of thinking from theory to practice way of thinking to; Three is the revolutionary transformation of philosophical ontology, that is, from practice to the epistemology of the survival theory to practice. We can derive from three dimensions to investigate and understand the connotation of Marx's practice. Practice is the two-way construction. From the perspective of dialectical materialism practice fosters priority status in the relationship between theory and practice. The value dimension of the practice stresses the individual's ethical care. It is based on the social reality of Capitalism, Marx established the practical materialism philosophy and confirmed the practice ontological status beyond the philosophy thinking of subject-object dual opposites theory. Marx's practice philosophy is revolutionary change to traditional philosophical world view. Marx's philosophical goal is to revolutionize the existing world and make people be liberated from slavery society situation. After Marx, western Marxism and the Soviet Marxism all have important interpretation of Marx's practical thought.The second chapter discusses Marx's practice viewpoint and the generation of China's Marxist literary criticism essential connotation. From the time, the early Chinese Marxist literary criticism after the May Fourth New Culture Movement, Proletarian Revolutionary Literature Movement formed the enlightenment practice, mass of the proletariat practice of two kinds of historical form practice. These movements mark the establishment of Chinese Marxist literary criticism practice. At the end of the last century 40s, with Mao Zedong's "Talks at the Yan-an Forum of Literature and Art", Chinese Marxist literary criticism formed the People-oriented pattern which is based on people's practice. People-oriented pattern shows the maturity of Chinese ideology of Marxism Literary Criticism practice. From the practice of discourse logic features, Chinese Marxist literary criticism emphasis on the class feeling discourse, revolutionary ethics consciousness, etc. On the morphology of discourse, Chinese Marxist literary criticism highlights the policy discourse of practice guidance meaning.Investigating the formation of Chinese Marxist literary criticism practice can reveal the historical choice of people-oriented pattern. In the process of its theoretical logic construction Chinese Marxist literary criticism emphasizes the practical epistemology. Moreover Chinese Marxist literary criticism focuses on practical subjects, attaches great importance of the practice of political ethical issues such as the three aspects of the theory of morphological characteristics.The third chapter researches the practice of epistemology and the feature of Chinese Marxist literary criticism paradigm inherent relationship. Under the influence of Marxist philosophy and reality of the Chinese revolution, Chinese Marxist literary criticism practice of accepting and understanding are mainly in the field of epistemology to understand. Thus the epistemological paradigm of Chinese Marxist literary criticism is on the basis of the practice. This practical epistemology criticism paradigm in the service of the Chinese revolution reality problem consciousness, focuses on literature as the promoting function of ideology on the revolutionary practice. Chinese Marxist literary criticism also underlines literary research on the combination of theory and practical experience. Furthermore Chinese Marxist literary criticism highlights the active role of subjects in the process of the interaction between Subject and Object in literary activities. It should be noted that subject of Chinese Marxist literary criticism pay more attention to the collective historical main subject of the broad masses of the people. Mao Zedong's practice, "Talks at the Yan-an Forum of Literature and Art" marks the formation of practical epistemology criticism paradigm. Based on the practical epistemological paradigm, Chinese Marxist literary criticism focuses on the active theory of revolutionary reflection of literary criticism mode. Under the active theory of revolutionary reflection, we can see that Chinese Marxist literary criticism has formed the problematic structure of practice. Chinese Marxist literary criticism emphasizes the practical feature of ideology, active life practice, as well as practical wisdom of the policy of literature and art criticism. And it promotes the revolutionary realism aesthetic principles on the artistic creation. But we should see objectively and criticize the theory of reflection mode in practice. People understand it in one-sided place. So in the perspective of practical epistemology, the dialectical theory of reflection, the aesthetic theory of reflection, the theory of aesthetic ideology all display the reflection criticism model for adjustment. As it were, epistemology is indispensable to the construction of the theoretical system of Chinese Marxist criticism. At the same time, the practice of Chinese Marxist literary criticism has the tendency to experience the epistemological paradigm. Through rethinking the reflection criticism model, Chinese Marxist literary criticism established the basis of the practical existence of the Chinese epistemology system of Marxist literary criticism. To build contemporary Chinese Marxist literary criticism, the practical existentialism is an important method and path selection.The fourth chapter mainly discusses the practice of the Chinese Marxist literary criticism practice of the subjective questions. Chinese Marxist literary criticism practice is the core content of subjectivity in order to get the victory in the revolution. People are taken as the main part of revolutionary practice subject. The practice of the revolutionary subject both inherited the subject consciousness, personality of the May 4th enlightenment and combined with the development of Chinese revolutionary reality against this subject consciousness. People are mainly used as a collective subject. From the enlightenment to the masses subject, we can suggest that Chinese Marxist literary criticism practical subject in the context of China's history has its own unique national character. In the face of a new era of socialist market economy reality, we should be in a certain historical period of the socialist market economy the context of China's reality, grasp the basic connotation of art production main body. From the practical history of Chinese Marxist literary criticism, the subjective experience and reality, the Chinese Marxist literary criticism of art production subject should take on the main body as the core connotation of the broad masses of the people. Chinese Marxist literary criticism was formed during the long years of revolution with the people as the core content of the practice subject with the rationality of history. There are some problems in Chinese Marxist literary criticism, which was the lack of enough emphasis on the individual. The value of the individual perceptual existence of subject of the people is not fully affirmation. The New Practice Aesthetics with existential view expand the connotation of practice, helped people deepen their understanding of the connotation of Marx's practice, for people to further insight into Chinese Marxist literary criticism on the content of practical subject. So New Practice Aesthetics also has important inspiration to develop the subjective connotation.The fifth chapter mainly researches the practice of political ethics dimension and understands the value orientation of Chinese Marxist literary criticism. From the practice of political ethics, political ethics value is the value measure of Marxist literary criticism. Its basic connotation and the ultimate concern of Chinese Marxist literary criticism have the tendency of political practice for the people's good social order of justice and the virtue of life. Because Chinese revolutionary cultural context, in the development process of Chinese Marxist literary criticism played down the political ethics construction of ontology level. But in terms of concrete political practice, thought of Chinese Marxist literary criticism by writers, revolutionary awareness of ethics, morals, individual responsibility and the people value, shows the importance in the political and ethical dimensions of its ethnic characteristics. Chinese Marxist literary criticism shows it in the aspect of political ethics and has its unique national features. But at the same time, we should note that war revolutionary cultural thinking and political ethics justice concerns eventually evolved into direct political ideology. Hard-left politics causes the political kidnapping and use of literature. Hard-Left politics also damages the independence of literature and the aesthetic transcendence value. Today we review the literature and political dimensions from the Angle of Marx's practice viewpoint in order to reflect on our existing theory tradition, historical experience. We rely on the Marxist practical survival perspective to construct the political and ethical value of Chinese Marxist literary criticism. We also want to pay attention to the ontological level of the value of Marxist literary criticism, justice demands the ultimate humanistic concern. It can be said that China's Marxist literary criticism practice basic connotation is to literature as the public body under certain historical condition and social and political ethics. It can be said that the basic meaning of Chinese Marxist literary criticism, literature is seen as changing the world for people subject with political ethics activities under certain historical conditions.The logic of practice is to understand Chinese Marxist literary criticism inherent nature of a series of basic problems and the research object contact premise. Therefore in the form of contemporary Chinese Marxist literary criticism, we should be based on the philosophy to stick to Marxist practice philosophy, always revolve around the Chinese modernization of social revolution, political and economic reform practice of realistic problems in the process of dialogue, artistic problem, the Marxist basic principle of integrating theory with practice, the term category of Marxist literary criticism theory, the research object of Sinicization. Chinese Marxist literary criticism dialogues with other schools of criticism and builds the priorities for the people of the people's literature practice on the basis of historical experience and its own historical traditions. People's literature beyond literature views of "May 4th" abstract man, formed the popularization of literature and art as the main medium of art practice patterns. Eventually Chinese Marxist literary criticism finished the paradigm change in the level of ontology based on the dialogue about "human literature". Practical Existentialism opens up broader historical space and value vision to construct Chinese morphology of Marxist literary criticism system.