The Ethical Alternatives Of Military Surgeon In The War Situation

The medical science doesn't want war, but the war can not get away from a medical science. The war circumstances educated military surgeon in the front of battle a special thing medical practices, also bringing military surgeon many heavy ethics problems and morals perplexity, such as the battlefield medical treatment triage, how treating a captive, battlefield euthanasia, vaccine usage, and the combat stress arouse etc.. These problems challenge peacetime principle and morals norm of the medical science ethics followed by doctor rigorously. This text commenced to investigate the morals source of the existent problem thoroughly from 4 aspects, namely: the military surgeon special morals role, morals emotion, morals obligation and morals field views.Immediately after, this text learned four aspect arguments the reasonableness of military surgeon choice to rely on from the occupation morals, emotion doctrine, international humanism law and the circumstances ethics, pointing out in the war circumstances militarysurgeon should according to the difference of circumstances------extremecircumstances, rigorous circumstances and not- rigorouscircumstances------to make a dissimilarity of ethics choice with replyquestion of ethics and ethics perplexity that the military surgeon faces. Subsequently aiming at the professional of military surgeon in the modern war, this text put forward an professional moral orientation to current war which military surgeons in the battlefield should obey, namely, threegreatest ethics principle------humanitarian saving and curing principle, fairprinciple, the efficiency principle, four ethics norm------harming diseaseprevention and cure and orientation to environment combining together, battlefield first aid and transferring to cure combining together, the reasonable stress arousing and controlling with behavior combining together, saving to cure right away and life long guarantee combining together.