Research On Legislation Of Liability System Of Administrative Decision-making

Administrative decision-making is the core sector of administration. Administrative mistakes in decision-making is often the biggest mistake. Whether democracy , or the rule of law according to the modern theory of building a responsible government's request, Government should be responsible for its administrative decision-making. Expansion is the nature of power , the power to avoid responsibility is instinctive response, and the rule of law is the effective backing to protect and accountability. The power of administrative decision-making is different from the power of administrative executing. This power is always possessed by a high official, so it's necessary to control this power by law .Only the compulsory legal means can breach of obstacles established by the power owner when responsibility investigation. Because law hasn't enough deterrent, there isn't a stable, workable responsibility investigation system. Accountability is difficult in many places and apartment. Pursue the administrative decision-making blunders in the responsibility not just an arbitrary, accidental "storm", and need to build a clear, workable, stability, continuity of the system. Will be incorporated into the decision-making accountability laws, regulations, scope, and make it become a decisive force, will be the establishment of administrative decision-making responsibility system, and to the decision-making more scientific and democratic, standardized and institutionalized can not be avoided, the most important topicThis paper mainly through four departments on the content of the realization of China's administrative decision-making accountability system of the meaning of the rule of law, necessity and means, and so on. The first part of the study determined the scope of the decision-making responsibility. Through the administrative decision-making and administrative decision-making responsibilities of these two core concepts of analysis, a different perspective on the different types of administrative decision-making responsibility for the analysis, and thus the scope of the study this designation. Construction of this part of this demonstration is the key to the framework. On this basis, the second part of the decision-making accountability system outlined in the rule of law. The first is the executive decision-making meaning of the accountability system analysis, and then the decision-making demonstration of the need for accountability. Analysis of administrative decision-making and accountability system of the characteristics of the rule of law, which pointed out that the decision-making accountability and the rule of law and the necessity of immediate significance. The third part is about our country's administrative status of a decision-making responsibility. Including major achievements, faced with a predicament and the existing basis carding three aspects. The last part is the author's idea of the decision-making on specific accountability system constructing .