Breakthrough And Dilemma

Being the special literature phenomenon of the special stage of Chinese literary history," Non-mainstream Literature of Seventeen-Year ", should have the independent research significance. In former research, some scholars made a lot of meticulous works, but mostly" salvage" a certain work and read it singly. Because they did not look the large-scale emergence of these works as a whole literature phenomenon, did not put it into the history scenario to research and analyze the" symptoms" of the phenomenon. Moreover, there also are some theories that some scholars research from the literary history angle, but are in whole range of Seventeen-Year Literature. No reading the concrete text originally, they generally think that the writer sway in the stipulation of the literature policy and the literature norm. The antinomy of that the writer individual life experience and politics pursue is how body now of and this kind of antinomy is definitely ascend to acquire the understanding what extent; Resolve the way contains the author to this problem how of comprehension and understanding; Do these comprehension and understanding really result to break through siege to the mainstream words? this, exactly this text do try to resolve.To investigate the antinomy between individual life and politics pursue and what extent the antinomy is definitely ascend to acquire the understanding, this text carries on it with followings: One, investigating the work of the meaning and emotion that the writer explores the individual life. Two, reading a batch of works that in the clip of politics looks for the individual to carry out with ego freely. In the process of reading, we can see that when duel with the antinomy between individual life with politics pursue," Non-mainstream Literature Seventeen-Year "of China lay particular emphasis on to the political ethics. Do literature policy and the literature norm at that time result to this kind of politics tendency that writers pursue?Ushering in some non-mainstream literature works of Soviets, we can answer this problem. In the process of according to each other, the writer find that under the same controls of the policy and norms of literature, the antinomy between the emotion and experience of the individual life with politics pursue is downplays in the Soviets non-mainstream literature, and the writers mostly had an a trait of the former "proceeding without hesitation". This stipulation proves the political high pressure such as the literature norm is not the reason that "Non-mainstream Literature of...