| Purpose: The aim of this study to investigate the expression of ERCC1ã€RRM1ã€TUBB3 protein in elderly advanced NSCLC patients, verify the relationship between ERCC1ã€RRM1ã€TUBB3 with genderã€smoking historyã€pathological patternã€clinical stagesã€performance status,and then investigate the correlation between these gene expression level and the efficacy of platinum- gemcitabine or paclitaxel chemotherapyã€prognosis in elderly advanced NSCLC patients.Method:A total of 77 elderly patients(age≥60) diagnosed with IIIB and IV stage NSCLC by histology,who were treated with first-line platnum-based chemotherapy,served as the study objects,these patients come from Shaanxi province cancer hospital in 2012.1~2014.12.Retrospectively analyzed those clinical medical records and pathological features, And collect the tumor tissue samples,the protein expression level of ERCC1,RRM1,and TUBB-3 were assessed by immunohistochemistry,the outcome are negative(-),low expression(+),medium expression(++) and high expression(+++) respectively.Statistics chemotherapy efficiency, progression-free survival(PFS), overall survival(OS) and 3-year survival rate,the last follow-up time is 2014.12.31,using SPSS 21.0 software for statistical analysis.Result: 1.The positive expression of ERCC1ã€RRM1ã€TUBB-3 protein in 77 cases was 68.8%ã€85.7%ã€79.2% respectively;2.There was no significant difference between the ERCC1,RRM1,TUBB-3 expression with gender, smoking history,pathological patternã€clinical stages.(Pï¹¥0.05);3.The response rate of chemotherapy was 33.3%, median survival time was12 months, one-year survival rate was82.2% for patients with ERCC1-negative expression,and 26.4%,6 months,and64.7%for patients with ERCC1-positive expression, respectively. Patients with negative expression of ERCC1 had better chemotherapy efficiency,longer overall survival than patients with positive expression.(P<0.05);4.The response rate of chemotherapy was 36.4%,median survival time was12 months, one-year survival rate was 81.8%for patients with RM1-negative expression, and 27.3%,8months, and69.5% for patients with RRM1-positive expression,respectively. Patients with negative expression of RRM1 had better chemotherapy efficiency,longer overall survival than patients with positive expression.(P<0.05);5.The response rate of chemotherapy was 37.5%,median survival time was12 months, one-year survival rate was 87.1%for patients with TUBB3-negative expression,and 27.9%,7 months,and 65.4% for patients with TUBB3-positive expression,respectively. Patients with negative expression of TUBB3 had better chemotherapy efficiency,longer overall survival than patients with positive expression.(P<0.05);6.For patients who treated with platinum-gemcitabine,the median survival time was16 months,one-year survival rate was75.0%for patients with RRM1-negative expression,and 14 months,with60.0% for patients with RRM1-positive expression,respectively. Patients with negative expression of RRM1 had longer overall survival than patients with positive expression.(P<0.05);7.For patients who treated with platinum-paclitaxel,the median survival time was17 months,one-year survival rate was 83.3%for patients with TUBB3-negative expression,And15 months,with 70.6% for patients with TUBB3-positive expression,respectively. Patients with negative expression of TUBB3 had longer overall survival than patients with positive expression.(P<0.05);Conclusion: 1.There was no significant difference between the ERCC1,RRM1,TUBB-3 expression with gender, smoking history,pathological patternã€clinical stagesã€performance status. 2.ERCC1,RRM1,TUBB3 cloud be a useful biomarker to predict clinical outcome in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first-line platinum-gemcitabine or paclitaxel chemotherapy. Has important guiding significance for the treatment of elderly advanced NSCLC. 3.The expression level of RRM1 can be used as a biomarker to treat with gemcitabine and judge prognosis in elderly advanced patients. 4.The expression level of TUBB3 can be used as a biomarker to choose paclitaxel chemotherapy and judge prognosis in elderly advanced patients. |