Research On The Plight Of Grass Roots Governance In The Process Of Capital To The Countryside

The Third Plenary Session of the 18th party have put forward:" encourage and guide commercial capital to rural development for enterprise management of modern breeding industry, to agricultural input factors of modern production and management mode". From 2012 onwards, with the NetEase pig so fresh vocabulary gradually began to appear in the news, urban industrial and commercial capital gradually look to the vast rural areas. At the same time, along with the advancement of industrialization and urbanization, majority of the central and western rural areas, labor is sucked a lot, land resources began to idle. In the central to local policies to encourage, idle land and idle capital of the two elements together, scholars called capital to the countryside".This article attempts from the study of J town in Hubei Province of of capital as a foreign special elements, and into the villages in Hubei and Hunan provinces atomic, in investment, land transfer and scale operation in three different processes respectively to the grass-roots governance bring about negative effects. In the investment process, the author found that the original grassroots governance top-level design, through administrative pressure to promote the "passive" public governance goal is likely to be replaced by the grass-roots organizations "spontaneous" self governance goal, Governance Dilemma produce target substitution; and in the process of land transfer, the original village the local governing authority in the three party cadres at the grassroots level, capital and villagers interaction gradually by the commercial authority capture and substitution, cause the conversion of grassroots governance authority; in the process of agricultural scale operation stage, originally as agricultural intermediary role contradiction and coordinator of grass-roots organizations in the agricultural intensification of contradictions gradually in a step by step to become the capital agent lead, role conflict and contradiction of grassroots organizations. Three governance difficulties in the course of the three process will impact directly or indirectly through different channels to the whole management of the grassroots level. Finally, suit the remedy to the case, superficially for the capital to the countryside three processes in three different governance dilemma are respectively put forward three strategies, to make a breakthrough in dilemma of grassroots governance.