Research On The Writing Types Of Xiao Hong’s Biography

The writing of Xiao Hong’s biography has been on the rise since the new era,but the increasing volume of Xiao Hong’s biography has not received enough attention in the research field.On the other hand,the popularity of Xiao Hong’s research remains high.The traditional research of works and literature history still treats biography as the data.However,biography is not only the writing material of literature history,but also the information of the author and the display of the author’s life context in the historical environment directly affect the interpretation of the author’s works.Writer biography is one of the more special category in his biography,announcing the writer identity for biography writing has certain limitation,and to a certain extent,makes the writer biography is distinguished from other types of biography,they show the fate of the ups and downs of intellectuals and the resulting impact on writers and their works,often show rare in other biography.Xiao Hong’s biography-writing has formed a scale in the author’s biography-writing,but its overall research needs to be improved.Aware of this,this paper starting from the writing contents of Xiao Hong’s biography,which is divided into research biography,literary biography and memories biography three categories to discuss,to interpret the meaning of each type of biography,analyze the advantages and limitations,and show the internal law of biographical writing,in order to promote the constant improvement of biography writing and biography research.The first chapter discusses the research biography,the research,the scientific reason and the speculation are the research biography distinctive characteristic.Biographers usually combine the biographical details and logical speculation with a rigorous attitude to make a judgment on Xiao Hong’s life nodes.Due to the embodiment of research characteristics,biography itself has become a kind of data for the reference of Xiao Hong researchers.The first section focuses on the characteristics of research-based biography,through the case study of biographical texts,explains the different aspects of the characteristics of research-based biography.The second section discusses the influence of the biographer’s writing standpoint on the performance of biography.The objective writing standpoint of research-based biography is closely related to the biographer’s rigorous pursuit of biography,while under the objective writing standpoint,the author’s positioning of Xiao Hong’s identity directly affects the performance effect of biography.The third section pointsout the problems existing in the research biography writing,namely the inappropriateness of the biographical material citation,which is mainly manifested in the confusion of the meaning between the biographical facts and the historical facts and Xiao Hong’s works.Xiao Hong’s life data mining are almost flat,in the case of not present new information,will be how to do,Xiao Hong’s biography writing for biographers have will be a bigger test,that means deep spot,on both the material at the same time also is not constrained by the limitation of material,show a biography research culture and academic character.The second chapter takes the literary biography as the object of discussion.The literary characteristics of biography are brought into full play in the writing of this kind of biography.The biographer is often moving with emotion,but this also makes most biographies pay too much attention to Xiao Hong’s emotional world and ignore the development and change of Xiao Hong’s thoughts in the turbulent times.The first section summarizes the literary characteristics of literary biography,appreciating the poetic nature of language and the balance between emotion and rationality achieved in the biography,so as to deeply interpret the true emotional image of Xiao Hong.The second section summarizes the image of Xiao Hong in the literary biography.The stubborn Xiao Hong and the sad Xiao Hong are the two main directions of the image creation in Xiao Hong’s biography.The tragic and rational image of Xiao Hong in Ye Jun’s Love for Nothing is a development of the previous image of Xiao Hong.In previous biographical studies,the metaphor of disease has not entered the field of vision of researchers,but considering the difference of the subjects,this paper holds that Xiao Hong’s life fate is closely related to the change of her disease.From this point of view,this paper attempts to link the creation of Xiao Hong’s image in literary biography with the story of Xiao Hong’s destiny.The last part of this chapter discusses the problem of truth and fiction in literary biography,which is also a difficult problem to be bypassed in biography writing.This paper holds that the truth of literary biography is reflected in the truth of emotion and environment,while fiction is the restrained play of biographers under the premise that the framework of authenticity has been established.The abuse of fiction in literary biography will make the image of the narrator more obscure,and the life of the narrator shown in the biography will become a one-sided emotional catharsis,which will damage the performance effect of literary biography.The third chapter discusses the reminiscing biography,in which the biographical information is authoritative because the biographer was or had close contact with the historical parties.However,such authority often makes it difficult for later biographers to break through the previous conclusions and create a dilemma.Thebiographer is both a historical witness and a historical aphasia.At the same time,the biographer has lost the aesthetic feeling and authenticity of the biography due to the excessive exertion of subjectivity.The first section of this chapter,through the overall grasp of reminiscence biography,analyzes the authority established and the predicament of biography writing brought by it.In the second section,the author points out the bias of the writing position,and in the third section,the author discusses the excessive exertion of the biographer’s subjectivity,which leads to the loss of the aesthetic feeling and the lose of objectivity.