Clinical Study On Treatment Of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Of Liver Stagnation And Spleen Deficiency With Gaohuang Moxibustion

Objective: This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy of Gaohuang Moxibustion with moxibustion and moxibustion points in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome of liver stagnation and spleen deficiency,and to provide new ideas and methods for clinical treatment of CFS,and to better guide the treatment of CFS.The clinical promotion of Gaohuang Moxibustion provides data support.Methods: A random number table method was used to randomly divide 108 patients who met the inclusion criteria into treatment group A,control group B,and control group C,with 36 cases in each group.Treatment group A adopts Gaohuang Moxibustion(BL43,CV6,ST36 + moxa cones moxibustion),control group B adopts Gaohuang Acupuncture(BL43,CV6,ST36 + needle-twisting method),and control group C adopts moxa cone moxibustion(acupoint selection based on the 13 th Five-Year Plan textbook "Acupuncture Therapeutics" +moxa cones moxibustion),once a day,a course of treatment is 10 times,the treatment interval is 2 days,and then two consecutive courses of treatment,all three groups 3 courses of treatment.Record the Fatigue Scale-14(FS-14)points of all patients before and after treatment,the Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Score Scale(TCMSSS)points,and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(PSQI)points,Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS)points,Self-Rating Depression Scale(SDS)points.Statistical analysis of all data adopts SPSS 20.0.Results:1.Comparison of clinical total effective rate: The treatment group A is 87.88%,the control group B is 59.38%,and the control group C is 65.63%.After treatment,the total clinical effective rate of the three groups is significantly different(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,there are significant differences between the treatment group A and the control group B,the treatment group A and the control group C(P<0.05),and the control group B and the control group C have no significant difference(P>0.05).2.Comparison of FS-14 points: There was no significant difference in FS-14 points between the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).Comparison of FS-14 points between the three groups after treatment showed significant differences(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,the treatment group A and the control group B,the treatment group A and the control group C have significant differences(P<0.05),the control group B and the control group C have no significant difference(P>0.05).3.Comparison of TCMSSS points: There was no significant difference in TCMSSS points between the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).Comparison of TCMSSS points between the three groups after treatment showed significant differences(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,the treatment group A and the control group B,the treatment group A and the control group C have significant differences(P<0.05),the control group B and the control group C have no significant difference(P>0.05).4.Comparison of PSQI points: There was no significant difference in PSQI points between the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).Comparison of PSQI points between the three groups after treatment showed significant differences(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,the treatment group A and the control group B,the treatment group A and the control group C have significant differences(P<0.05),the control group B and the control group C have no significant difference(P>0.05).5.Comparison of SAS points: There was no significant difference in SAS points between the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).Comparison of SAS points between the three groups after treatment showed significant differences(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,there is a significant difference between the treatment group A and the control group C(P<0.05),and there is no significant difference between the treatment group A and the control group B,the control group B and the control group C(P>0.05).6.Comparison of SDS points: There was no significant difference in SDS points between the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).Comparison of SDS points between the three groups after treatment showed significant differences(P<0.05).After pairwise comparison,the treatment group A and the control group B,the treatment group A and the control group C have significant differences(P<0.05),the control group B and the control group C have no significant difference(P>0.05).Conclusions:1.The clinical efficacy of Gaohuang Moxibustion is better than Gaohuang Acupuncture group and moxa cone moxibustion group;2.Gaohuang Moxibustion,Gaohuang Acupuncture and moxa cone moxibustion can all improve the clinical symptoms of CFS of liver stagnation and spleen deficiency to varying degrees;3.Gaohuang Moxibustion can relieve fatigue,improve sleep,regulate anxiety and depression,and have a significant effect on the treatment of CFS of liver stagnation and spleen deficiency.