| The report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China emphasizes that the next step of the country is to focus on the construction of rural public cultural services.Through various forms of cultural activities at the rural grassroots level,we can get through the culture and enter the last kilometer of rural people’s life.In recent years,China’s rural public cultural service construction achievements are very rich,but there are also deficiencies.It is very important to clarify the development status of rural public cultural services and explore the main factors that affect the operation performance for promoting the sustainable development of rural public cultural services equalization.Therefore,this paper focuses on the construction of public cultural services in rural areas,constructs an analysis framework of fiscal expenditure efficiency of public cultural services,and systematically studies its influencing factors.On the one hand,the paper uses the CCR model and BBC model of DEA method to analyze the performance of rural public cultural services,and finds that the comprehensive efficiency value of public cultural services in rural areas of China is low and has not been improved in the past decade;the low pure technical efficiency is the main reason for the inefficiency of DEA;the overall performance of scale income is increasing returns to scale;the eastern rural public cultural services Construction The operating efficiency of fiscal expenditure has improved,but the central and western regions have not;the financial input-output capacity of rural public cultural services in the central region is always better than that in the East and West.On the other hand,the paper uses DEA Malmquist index analysis method to explore the dynamic relationship between TFP of each decision-making unit in pure technical efficiency,scale efficiency and technological progress.The empirical results show that the total factor productivity of rural public cultural service construction fiscal expenditure in 31 provinces(cities)in China has been less than 1 in 2008-2017;the total factor productivity of 18 provinces(cities)has been improved;the total factor productivity of the provinces that have made progress,the improvement of productivity is mainly due to the progress of comprehensive efficiency,while the average TFP of some provinces(cities)does not increase but decreases,The main reason is the decline of the change index of technological progress;the performance development of rural public cultural services in the East,middle and West is unbalanced,and the TFP average value of the three regions is less than 1.The TFP average value of rural public cultural services Construction in the East is the highest,followed by that in the middle and West.In the study of external factors,through Tobit model analysis,it can be concluded that illiteracy rate has no significant impact on the comprehensive efficiency;the proportion of rural public cultural expenditure in fiscal expenditure,the negative correlation between per capita GDP and the comprehensive efficiency;population density has a positive impact on the comprehensive efficiency.Based on the above conclusions,this paper finally gives some policy suggestions.First,we need to improve the value of comprehensive efficiency,starting from pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency,to enhance internal management capacity and optimize the structure of cultural expenditure;second,we need to speed up the technological progress in the central and western regions,enhance financial autonomy,and reduce regional differences;third,we need to start from the technological progress factors that contribute less to the growth of total factor productivity,to promote the combination of culture and technology,and promote the promotion of literature Fourth,we should strengthen the efficiency of financial allocation and improve the system of cultural financial transfer payment.The possible innovations of this paper are as follows:firstly,it initially constructs the performance analysis framework of public cultural service financial expenditure from the perspective of rural areas;secondly,it systematically discusses the efficiency of rural public cultural service financial expenditure,and uses Tobit method to study the impact of external factors on rural public cultural service performance.However,there are still some defects and deficiencies in this paper.First,this paper is unable to collect some index data that have not been statistically analyzed.Second,some policy suggestions put forward in this paper.Due to the lack of analysis on the specific situation of each province and city,the practical operation and implementation effect may not be strong,so they need to be improved pertinently. |